[AusNOG] Management VRF
Russell Langton
russell3901 at gmail.com
Thu Dec 11 12:55:02 EST 2014
Hi Ben,
I'm not sure of the size of your network here, but lets ask anyway....
Is a dedicated management network out of the question?
This would separate the data-plane from the control plane, and prevent any
issues in the devices in-band effecting your control of the devices.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Ben Hohnke <settra at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Noggers,
>
> I've been doing a little research around management VRF's, mainly for
> splitting my company's network management traffic into it's own VRF, to
> shield it from any potential routing issues.
> I know some of our kit, such as the Cisco ASR 1001 and cat4948's have
> dedicated management ethernet interfaces locked in a management VRF.
>
> At this stage I see two common options:
> Management traffic in a VRF with RFC1918 addressing, and
> Management traffic in the global routing table, with customer traffic,
> with BGP etc in a VRF (i.e, turn it all "inside out")
>
> I'm curious to see others thoughts on this, and what implementations
> you've all put in place out there?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ben
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20141211/984863c3/attachment.html>
More information about the AusNOG
mailing list