[AusNOG] Data retention definitions

[Skeeve Stevens]

Ice Bucket Metadata Challenge?  Nah... people would wimp out :)


...Skeeve

*Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
skeeve at eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com

Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve

facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ;  <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>
linkedin.com/in/skeeve

twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com


The Experts Who The Experts Call
Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering


On 30 August 2014 09:12, Bevan Slattery <bevan at slattery.net.au> wrote:

> We as an industry should get our **** together, come up with an
> advertising campaign that illustrates the problem and in simple
> writing/video and email the 3,000,000 subscribers/users that we have apart
> from Telstra and Optus.
>
> We should have a "metadata" day in which we undertake significant
> activities such as all change our our home pages to a metadata landing page
> to draw attention to this with a video demonstrating the issue at large.
>
> Posting to AUSNOG is not going to help and don't expect businesses to get
> involved because we haven't helped them understand why they should be
> concerned.
>
> [b]
>
> On 30 Aug 2014, at 8:47 am, David Beveridge <dave at bevhost.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Mark Newton <newton at atdot.dotat.org>
> wrote:
>
>> The group of businesses in this forum will only be tasked to store the
>> data if the proposal gets up.
>>
>> The proposal is less likely to get up if there is a broad campaign
>> against it.
>>
>> You're talking about post apocalyptic practicalities. I'm talking about
>> showing leadership to make sure the war doesn't start in the first place.
>>
>>    - mark
>>
>>
> Perhaps we should be getting the business community behind this effort.
> I'm sure corporates and small business alike are not geared up to collect
> and store all this data.
> From memory, the requirement is that all "entities" be required to store
> the "metadata".
> I can see any reason why any "entity" who runs a NAT gateway would be
> exempt from this.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20140830/27214cb5/attachment.html>