[AusNOG] Go Bulletproof - IPv5

[Mark Ashley]

I heard they tried IPv69 as well, but it sucked.


On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Greg Anderson <ganderson at raywhite.com>wrote:

> Unfortunately even IPv6 has taken off more than that RFC has been adopted.
>  If you were pissed at someone and you told them so using that RFC - would
> that be another method of flipping them the bird?
>
>
> On 1 April 2014 10:16, Warren Bold <wbold at polyfone.com.au> wrote:
>
>>  Perhaps RFC 1149 can bridge the space between consumer ipv4 and ipv5
>> cloud services?
>>
>>
>>
>> :P
>>
>>
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>>
>>
>> Warren Bold
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] *On Behalf Of *Mark
>> Currie
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 1 April 2014 9:41 AM
>> *To:* ausnog at ausnog.net
>>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AusNOG] Go Bulletproof - IPv5
>>
>>
>>
>> Only if you are in the cloud at the time...or connected to the cloud by a
>> IPv5 VPN Gateway...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Mark Currie
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 1 April 2014 10:40 AM
>> *To:* 'Joseph Goldman'
>> *Subject:* RE: [AusNOG] Go Bulletproof - IPv5
>>
>>
>>
>> Only if you are in the cloud at the time...or connected to the cloud by a
>> IPv5 VPN Gateway...
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net<ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net>]
>> *On Behalf Of *Joseph Goldman
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 1 April 2014 10:25 AM
>> *To:* ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
>> *Subject:* Re: [AusNOG] Go Bulletproof - IPv5
>>
>>
>>
>> So by this new standard, when I accidentally go a bit too far and end up
>> with 8.8.8.8.8, it might actually work? :P
>>
>> On 01/04/14 10:22, Mark Currie wrote:
>>
>> This is a new RFC - RFC 140401 IPv5 Fifth Byte CIDR for Cloud Based
>> Platforms
>>
>>
>>
>> Mark Currie
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net<ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net>]
>> *On Behalf Of *Warren Bold
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 1 April 2014 9:42 AM
>> *To:* Trent Farrell; Lincoln Dale
>> *Cc:* ausnog at ausnog.net
>> *Subject:* Re: [AusNOG] Go Bulletproof - IPv5
>>
>>
>>
>> Would that comply with RFC 1149?
>>
>>
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>>
>>
>> Warren Bold
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net<ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net>]
>> *On Behalf Of *Trent Farrell
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, 1 April 2014 8:14 AM
>> *To:* Lincoln Dale
>> *Cc:* ausnog at ausnog.net
>> *Subject:* Re: [AusNOG] Go Bulletproof - IPv5
>>
>>
>>
>> I've been waiting for someone to trial this for ages. Hoping it will go
>> well with my Fibre over MPLS solution I've been working on
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Lincoln Dale <ltd at aristanetworks.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> <skeeve+ausnog at eintellegonetworks.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> http://www.itnews.com.au/News/381353,bulletproof-trials-cloud-only-ipv5.aspx
>>
>>
>>
>> i heard it relies on SDN and is pretty cool because of that.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AusNOG mailing list
>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> *Trent Farrell*
>>
>> *Riot Games*
>>
>> *IP Network Engineer*
>>
>> E: tfarrell at riotgames.com | IE:  +353 86 845 7230 | US: +1 424 285 9825
>>
>> Summoner name: Foro
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> AusNOG mailing list
>>
>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>>
>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AusNOG mailing list
>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20140401/49051c29/attachment.html>