[AusNOG] Go Bulletproof - IPv5

[Greg Anderson]

I think that IPv5 is really just a stab in the dark without addressing the
real issues we need addressed.  We all know IPv6 is a massive step
backwards (no NAT - WHAAATT??)  - but after all the reading I have done on
IPvX (Or as it is becoming commonly known IPX) you can see how much of a
mistake was made IPv4,6 AND 5.  And it doesn't use IP addresses either.

IPX FTW.




On 1 April 2014 08:41, Warren Bold <wbold at polyfone.com.au> wrote:

>  Would that comply with RFC 1149?
>
>
>
> Kind regards
>
>
>
> Warren Bold
>
>
>
> *From:* AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] *On Behalf Of *Trent
> Farrell
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 1 April 2014 8:14 AM
> *To:* Lincoln Dale
> *Cc:* ausnog at ausnog.net
> *Subject:* Re: [AusNOG] Go Bulletproof - IPv5
>
>
>
> I've been waiting for someone to trial this for ages. Hoping it will go
> well with my Fibre over MPLS solution I've been working on
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Lincoln Dale <ltd at aristanetworks.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> <skeeve+ausnog at eintellegonetworks.com> wrote:
>
>
> http://www.itnews.com.au/News/381353,bulletproof-trials-cloud-only-ipv5.aspx
>
>
>
> i heard it relies on SDN and is pretty cool because of that.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *Trent Farrell*
>
> *Riot Games*
>
> *IP Network Engineer*
>
> E: tfarrell at riotgames.com | IE:  +353 86 845 7230 | US: +1 424 285 9825
>
> Summoner name: Foro
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>


--
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20140401/b5c06301/attachment.html>