[AusNOG] Reminder to fix 1.1.1.0 IP block

[Skeeve Stevens]

Phil,

This will never be allocated to anyone... and it is only a /24 anyhow..

Cisco actually rolled this out as the default addressing for their wireless
controllers.

Basically as long as you aren't announcing it, it won't do any harm.

The reason some people are, is I think APNIC uses it for some testing to
see how much traffic attempts to go to it... and they use other networks to
assist in this...

Personally, I think it is a non-issue.


...Skeeve

*Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
skeeve at eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com

Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve

facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ;  <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>
linkedin.com/in/skeeve

twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com


The Experts Who The Experts Call
Juniper - Cisco - Cloud


On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Phillip Grasso <phillip.grasso at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Noggers
>
> Be on good side of IP Address Karma!
>
> If you run/operate/own a network utilizing 1.1.1.0 address space (or 1/8)
> inside your network but used for Internet connectivity, could you kindly
> renumber to appropriate RFC1918 or appropriate public address space.
>
> Terry & Geoff have raised the topic of 1/8 allocation<http://mailman.apnic.net/mailing-lists/apnic-talk/archive/2010/04/msg00002.html>previously.
>
>
> Best Regards
>   Phill.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20131106/1570c133/attachment.html>