[AusNOG] UK server hosting

[august forsakov]

partly, we wouldnt be using the VPC... getting applications cloud ready is
another story...
Amazon has lots of complementary products, such as Route 53, RDS, Load
balancing, Elastic cloud ... not to mention the instances and volumes etc.
In order for an application to run on there, you need to have your app
pretty streamlined... there's a few gotchas...


On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 3:55 PM, Geoff Northcott
<geoff.northcott at miraz.com>wrote:

> Clustered file store spanning the two irish availability zones inside a
> VPC to provide a redundant back end data store?
>
> On 02/05/2013, at 12:31 PM, august forsakov <forsakov at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Tim.
>
> This is about having a loadbalancer on AWS. In order to have this working
> optimally, the app needs to have neatly segregated coding and data.
> As you know AWS works with instances, volumes and separate
> loadbalancers...
> In order to have redundancy the application needs to be cross-region. It
> happens that there are 2 regions in Ireland (from what I gather).
> The problem comes about when there is a mix of data and application code
> across regions... much cleaner if you can mount a volume with just the
> data...
> Of course its possible to mount the whole (in our case tomcat) ROOT
> directory on an AWS volume, but it may not work as well as having
> everything properly carved up... and mounting a separate data Volume...
> The way AWS architecture is set up, you have to make sure your app
> complies with this requirement ...
>
> Hope that clarifies...
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 6:17 PM, Tim March <march.tim at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hey,
>>
>> Drop me a note and tell me why you think the application won't run in
>> that environment. I've got a lot of experience engineering large,
>> distributed application platforms up to EC2 (think Realestate.com.au<http://realestate.com.au/>)
>> and would be interested to hear where your break point is.
>>
>>
>>
>> T.
>>
>>
>> On 29/04/13 5:00 PM, august forsakov wrote:
>>
>>> Yes. Have considered. App isnt capable for AWS, has to do with
>>> separation of data and logic. Thnks tho.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Tim March <march.tim at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:march.tim at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>     Have you considered using AWS? Just spin up your instances in the
>>>     same availability zone than use elastic IP/LB's for front end
>>>     routing and load balancing. It'll take you a 10'th of the time to
>>>     get up and running (eg. you'll have your hosts in 5 minutes) and be
>>>     infinitely more configurable and more resilient than a physical box.
>>>
>>>     Spinning up ESX hosts in shady DC's on the other side of the world
>>>     is a thing of the past. Viva le cloud... =)
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards.
> Gus
>  _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>


-- 
Best regards.
Gus
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20130503/17383d96/attachment.html>