[AusNOG] TPG melbourne issues?

jay binks jaybinks at gmail.com
Wed Mar 27 20:38:12 EST 2013


I remember a day ( seems long ago ) when the "N" in "NOG" referred to
Carrier or Carriage Networks.

Threads like this ( and the many many more I ignore every day ) make
me question if im reading AusNOG or Whirlpool.
I think a small part of me died,  the moment I decided to reply to this thread.

Jay




On 27 March 2013 19:18, Joshua D'Alton <joshua at railgun.com.au> wrote:
> If the moderators have a problem with this (or any) thread they'll address
> it, no need to be condescending. The thread Andrew made 7hrs ago was useful,
> I'm willing to bet at least 1 other person found this thread useful as well.
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Cameron Ferdinands
> <cameron at jferdinands.com> wrote:
>>
>> Please read the charter before posting, the latest copy is here:
>> http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/2013-March/016880.html
>>
>> This is NOT a forum for journalists to pick up leads, sales people to
>>    sell things, end-users to pester their ISP
>>
>> Official support channels exist for a reason.
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Joshua D'Alton <joshua at railgun.com.au>
>> wrote:
>> > They replied this morning and it was already fixed.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 7:50 PM, James Paussa <lists at paussa.net> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> What have TPG said? Lodging a fault is normally a good start.
>> >>
>> >> -James.
>> >>
>> >> Sent from a mobile device.
>> >>
>> >> On 26/03/2013 10:01 PM, "Joshua D'Alton" <joshua at railgun.com.au> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks not really a thread about general TPG quality, more about a
>> >>> current possible issue. I realise what the latency could be, but given
>> >>> TPG
>> >>> latency in this particular area has been great for the past 8 months I
>> >>> think
>> >>> the post is justified as a possible extraneous network issue.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Jeremy Visser <jeremy at visser.name>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 26/03/13 22:05, Joshua D'Alton wrote:
>> >>>> > 1    <1 ms     1 ms    <1 ms  xxxxxxxx
>> >>>> > 2    68 ms    73 ms    94 ms  nme-nxg-wal-bras4-lo-20.tpgi.com.au
>> >>>> > [10.20.20.224]
>> >>>>
>> >>>> You think 100 msec is bad.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> This is an ADSL1 Open 1 (8000k) connection on a Telstra RIM in a
>> >>>> regional area whose current sole purpose is to serve as an empty
>> >>>> connection to measure speed and latency:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> <https://sunriseroad.net/files/31c1d645d14afb42f38be67fcc7cbb4d>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ...and I’ve seen worse than that before.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> AusNOG mailing list
>> >>>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>> >>>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> AusNOG mailing list
>> >>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>> >>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> AusNOG mailing list
>> >> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>> >> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > AusNOG mailing list
>> > AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>> > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>



-- 
Sincerely

Jay



More information about the AusNOG mailing list