[AusNOG] IPv6: Who's dual stacked? Why don't I look stacked?

[Don Gould]

Yip, and you want to see the latency to this one...

2001:470:c:6e8::2 - home.bowenvale.co.nz tunnel end.

What you're looking at is my US based VPS which I have not been able to 
get a native solution to yet despite being on that case for 18 months.

I did make the comment at Mark earlier that his comment about just 'do a 
little as you go' and you'll get there was rubbish.... I'm sorry, I 
didn't actually qualify that every well.

What Mark said to do is exactly what I have been doing and I'm still not 
there.  The road blocks and people who are just not interested in 
playing the game are just OTT, hence why I've just gone OTT on whinging 
about it this week when I saw the shit fight that broke out on list last 
week.

D




On 8/03/2013 10:21 a.m., Greg McLennan wrote:
> Don, just for your info while you diagnose your mail...
>
> For latency between here Geelong(Internode ADSL) to your router.
>
>
> C:\Users\Greg>ping 2403:cc00:1000:0:200:20ff:fe01:8502
>
> Pinging 2403:cc00:1000:0:200:20ff:fe01:8502 with 32 bytes of data:
> Reply from 2403:cc00:1000:0:200:20ff:fe01:8502: time=238ms
> Reply from 2403:cc00:1000:0:200:20ff:fe01:8502: time=234ms
> Reply from 2403:cc00:1000:0:200:20ff:fe01:8502: time=232ms
> Reply from 2403:cc00:1000:0:200:20ff:fe01:8502: time=234ms
>
> Ping statistics for 2403:cc00:1000:0:200:20ff:fe01:8502:
>     Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
> Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
>     Minimum = 232ms, Maximum = 238ms, Average = 234ms
>
> C:\Users\Greg>
>
> &  A traceroute
>
> C:\Users\Greg>tracert -6 2403:cc00:1000:0:200:20ff:fe01:8502
>
> Tracing route to 2403:cc00:1000:0:200:20ff:fe01:8502 over a maximum of 
> 30 hops
>
>   1     2 ms     2 ms     2 ms 
> 2001-44b8-4173-7904-0000-0000-0000-0001.static.i
> pv6.internode.on.net [2001:44b8:4173:7904::1]
>   2    36 ms    35 ms    34 ms  loop0.lns20.mel4.on.ii.net 
> [2001:44b8:c040::5]
>   3    36 ms    35 ms    35 ms  te2-2.cor3.mel4.on.ii.net 
> [2001:44b8:c040:15::1]
>
>   4    35 ms     *       35 ms  gi1-0-0.bdr1.mel4.on.ii.net 
> [2001:44b8:c040:1f::
> 2]
>   5    47 ms     *       47 ms  te5-0-0.bdr1.syd6.on.ii.net 
> [2001:44b8:c040:d::2
> ]
>   6   201 ms     *      201 ms  pos1-0-0.bdr1.lax1.on.ii.net 
> [2001:44b8:b060:1::
> 22]
>   7   200 ms   200 ms   200 ms  2001:504:13::1a
>   8   209 ms   214 ms   208 ms 10gigabitethernet7-3.core1.sjc2.he.net 
> [2001:470
> :0:16a::1]
>   9   219 ms   209 ms   215 ms 10gigabitethernet1-1.core1.fmt1.he.net 
> [2001:470
> :0:2f::1]
>  10   210 ms   210 ms   211 ms  f0-0.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net 
> [2001:470:0:44::2]
>  11   234 ms   233 ms   233 ms 2403:cc00:1000:0:200:20ff:fe01:8502
>
> Trace complete.
>
> C:\Users\Greg>
>
>
> Cheers
> Greg...
>
>
> --------------------
>
> On 8/03/2013 8:11 AM, Don Gould wrote:
>> Why don't my email headers suggest I'm dual stacked?
>>
>>
>> thinkdesignprint.co.nz>_ ~# ifconfig
>> eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:00:20:01:85:02
>>           inet addr:117.121.243.25  Bcast:117.121.243.255 
>> Mask:255.255.255.0
>>           inet6 addr: 2403:cc00:1000:0:200:20ff:fe01:8502/64 
>> Scope:Global
>>           inet6 addr: fe80::200:20ff:fe01:8502/64 Scope:Link
>>
>>
>> I've got an IPv6 address on my server but it doesn't look like my 
>> mail application is using it if you look at the headers in this message.
>>
>> I discovered this because I thought it might be interesting to have a 
>> bit of a look at my favourite lists and see how we're going in 
>> industry for dual stacking.
>>
>> On 8/03/2013 9:34 a.m., Mark Smith wrote:
>> > Your sarcasm is obvious, and clearly you're the horse that doesn't 
>> want to drink water.
>>
>> Mark's comments were fear enough this morning.
>>
>> If he's bothered to take just 10 seconds to have a look at my message 
>> headers, it's no wonder he'd be thinking I'm just yanking the chain.
>>
>> I dual stacked that VPS 18 months ago, but it seems it's not playing 
>> the game.
>>
>> It's no wonder that we're only seeing 1% traffic if the traffic isn't 
>> flowing.
>>
>> D
>>
>>
>> FYI for Friday fun...
>>
>> GOOD
>> canonical name     lists.ausnog.net.
>> aliases
>> addresses     2407:9000:3::9
>> 203.161.158.9
>>
>> BAD
>> canonical name     list.waikato.ac.nz.
>> aliases
>> addresses     130.217.66.63
>>
>> BAD
>> canonical name     forums.whirlpool.net.au.
>> aliases
>> addresses     117.53.166.22
>>
>> BAD
>> canonical name     geekzone.co.nz.
>> aliases
>> addresses     202.175.128.169
>> 202.175.128.164
>>
>> GOOD
>> www.nznog.org
>> canonical name     ghs.googlehosted.com.
>> aliases
>> addresses     2607:f8b0:4003:c02::79
>> 173.194.64.121
>>
>> Source:  www.domainwhitepages.com
>


-- 
Don Gould
31 Acheson Ave
Mairehau
Christchurch, New Zealand
Ph: + 64 3 348 7235
Mobile: + 64 21 114 0699