[AusNOG] IPv6 - What Should an Engineer Address when 'Selling' IPv6 to Executives?

[Michael Biber]

Last week's APNIC35 in Singapore had a presentation from Cameron Byrne
T-Mobile:
http://conference.apnic.net/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/58870/tmo-ipv6-feb-2
013_1361827441.pdf
Cameron claims they implemented IPv6 as the default end user infrastructure
for their 3GPP and LTE rollout and that it was implemented at $0 capital
outlay... done by sensible IPv6 capability in their procurement policies.
(All legacy IPv4 connectivity is provided via 464XLAT).
Mike Biber


-----Original Message-----
From: ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net
[mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Jeremy Visser
Sent: Wednesday, 6 March 2013 10:22 PM
To: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] IPv6 - What Should an Engineer Address when 'Selling'
IPv6 to Executives?

On 6/03/2013 21:43, Jethro Carr wrote:
>I do know, however, that IPv6 over GSM exists (last I looked into it was
2010, where I think T-Mobile in the US had it on a trial basis, and possibly
Verizon were trialling some NAT64 stuff on their LTE service).