[AusNOG] Returned IP address resource allocation proposal

[Greg M]

As a small provider who needs more than 4 /24's, this is awesome. $20k+ now
for a /22 on the IP trading websites is just getting crazy, and for those
"new" APNIC members who could only get a /22, then this is going to be very
useful.

 

Greg

 

From: AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Skeeve
Stevens
Sent: Tuesday, 16 July 2013 2:23 PM
To: Andrew Yager
Cc: <AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Returned IP address resource allocation proposal

 

Actually, it isn't as simple as that - the proposal is about using non 103/8
blocks and re-allocation of returned ranges. 

 

I'd love everyone to be involved in the discussion however... please join
the APNIC policy SIG mailing list
(http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/sig-policy)

 

I've just resigned as Co-Chair, which means I am now able to partake freely
in discussions again... Yah.





...Skeeve

 

Skeeve Stevens - eintellego Networks Pty Ltd

skeeve at eintellegonetworks.com <mailto:skeeve at eintellegonetworks.com>  ;
www.eintellegonetworks.com <http://www.eintellegonetworks.com/> 

Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve

facebook.com/eintellegonetworks <http://facebook.com/eintellegonetworks>  ;
linkedin.com/in/skeeve <http://linkedin.com/in/skeeve>  

twitter.com/networkceoau <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>  ; blog:
www.network-ceo.net <http://www.network-ceo.net/> 

  <http://eintellegonetworks.com/logos/ein09.png> 

The Experts Who The Experts Call

Juniper - Cisco - Cloud

 

On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Andrew Yager <andrew at rwts.com.au
<mailto:andrew at rwts.com.au> > wrote:

Hi All,

 

There is currently a proposal before APNIC to allow an additional /22
allocation of IPv4 address space to members from the returned pool of IPv4
addresses to APNIC. According to the commentary on the proposal, APNIC has
sufficient resources in this pool to allocate each member an additional /22.

 

I'm guessing most of us are in favour of this *in principle*.

 

The proposal is http://www.apnic.net/policy/proposals/prop-105

 

I'm planning to respond saying that we are in favour, but would be
interested in others thoughts/comments. 

 

Thanks,

Andrew

 

--

Andrew Yager, Managing Director   (MACS Snr CP BCompSc MCP MCE JNCIA-Junos)
Real World Technology Solutions Pty Ltd  - IT people you can trust
ph: 1300 798 718 or (02) 9037 0500
fax: (02) 9037 0591 mob: 0405 152 568
http://www.rwts.com.au/

 

 

 

 

 

 


_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net> 
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20130716/2d8683a5/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6469 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20130716/2d8683a5/attachment.bin>