[AusNOG] Domestic Peering WAS: Vocus peering traffic missingfrom PIPE-IX?

[Chris Ricks]

They'd be making significantly less use of AAPT transit for ex-AAPT
residential customers than AAPT ever did though.

iiNet peer pretty much everywhere, have segregated international transit
(that AAPT doesn't seem to contribute to) and have their own peering
with content providers like Google, not to mention locally hosted Akamai
gear to serve iiCustomers from.

Plus, they've also got access to Internode's list of peers all over the
globe, potentially reducing their dependence on Reach as well.

On 09/11/12 16:40, Joshua D'Alton wrote:
> iiNet are still having to rely on AAPT for a lot of their
> connectivity, so seems like it isn't as obvious a win.
>
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Matthew Moyle-Croft <mmc at mmc.com.au
> <mailto:mmc at mmc.com.au>> wrote:
>
>     On 08/11/2012, at 8:48 PM, Andrew Warburton
>     <andrew.warburton at aapt.com.au
>     <mailto:andrew.warburton at aapt.com.au>> wrote:
>
>     > Is this the point where the conversation shifts from being a
>     productive discussion to a display of personal grudges?
>
>     That's a bit overly sensitive.  But it's reality - the amount of
>     traffic to/from AAPT/VzB isn't that much anymore since both sold
>     off your eyeballs to iiNET.
>
>     MMC
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     AusNOG mailing list
>     AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
>     http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20121109/8c5b377c/attachment.html>