[AusNOG] Domestic Peering WAS: Vocus peering traffic missingfrom PIPE-IX?
Brad Gould
bradley at internode.com.au
Fri Nov 9 10:23:26 EST 2012
Just because no money changes hands, does not mean its free.
Port costs. Interconnect costs. Network complexity costs. Monitoring costs.
How much does establishing a PoP in another DC to pick up peering cost?
Sure, you can soak most of that into your normal ongoings and operations, but its there.
Brad
On 09/11/2012, at 9:39:38, Luke Iggleden wrote:
> On 9/11/12 9:45 AM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 8, 2012, at 12:10 PM, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith at yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>> The assertion was peering is free / gratis / no money. That's clearly incorrect, and I don't think you need much more than a simplification to realise it.
>>
>> However, it's a reasonable generalization, since it holds true 99.75% of the time.
>>
>> http://www.pch.net/resources/papers//peering-survey/PCH-Peering-Survey-2011.pdf
>>
>> You really want to argue over a 0.25% corner case?
>>
>> -Bill
>
>
> Great data, thanks Bill!
>
> In particular, it's very interesting to see that 99.51% of the peering relationships were set-up by handshake agreements.
>
> I wonder how many of the formalized agreements were in fact the paid asymmetric agreements?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
--
Brad Gould, Network Engineer
Internode
PO Box 284, Rundle Mall 5000
Level 5, 150 Grenfell Street, Adelaide 5000
P: 08 8228 2999 F: 08 8235 6999
bradley at internode.com.au; http://www.internode.on.net/
More information about the AusNOG
mailing list