[AusNOG] Stay Smart, is not so Smart

[Nick Savvides]

The transport layer shouldn't matter.

The data layer should have been encrypted, with the keys distributed out of
band.

Nick.

-------------------------------------------------------
Nick Savvides
Senior Principal Systems Engineer,
Information & Identity Protection
nick_savvides at symantec.com
Mobile: +61 434 600 870
Phone: +61 3 9674 5543
Fax: +61 3 9674 5574

Symantec
Level 3, 437 St. Kilda Road
Melbourne, Victoria, 3004


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net [mailto:ausnog-
> bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Mark Newton
> Sent: Wednesday, 11 July 2012 15:16
> To: Jared Hirst
> Cc: ausnog at ausnog.net
> Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Stay Smart, is not so Smart
> 
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 11:24:56AM +1000, Jared Hirst wrote:
> 
>  > Why would they send such data via Australia post???
> 
> The jaw dropper for me was DBCDE's revelation in Monday's SMH that the
> contractor who sent the lost data was AusCERT.
> 
> Why would *THEY* send such data via Australia Post???
> 
>   - mark
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5856 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20120710/8987ca0d/attachment.bin>