[AusNOG] Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Content Services Gateway Vulnerabilities

[Phil Pierotti]

You're entirely correct, I didn't mean to imply otherwise.

Personally I don't mind vendor-psirt showing on vendor-discuss, usually if I'm interested in B I'd also be interested in A.

I'm just trying to say that if today we add vendor-c and tomorrow vendor-* (J, B/F, R/E, A/L, H to name a few), pretty soon there's more traffic on the list from vendor-mail (which many of us already subscribe to the ones we care about) than anything else.

Perhaps we could have something in the ausnog-welcome letter-to-subscribers publishing a list of (potentially) really useful mailing lists?

Or maybe just a link back to a page on ausnog.net?

There's already a link off the front page for *our* mailing-list, how about one for "other relevant lists"?

Regards,

Phil Pierotti
Network Operations Manager
Platform Networks
www.platformnetworks.net
ph. 1300 854 678


-----Original Message-----
From: David Hughes [mailto:David at Hughes.com.au] 
Sent: Thursday, 27 January 2011 12:34 PM
To: Phil Pierotti
Cc: ausnog at ausnog.net
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Cisco Security Advisory: Cisco Content Services Gateway Vulnerabilities


On 27/01/2011, at 11:11 AM, Phil Pierotti wrote:

> - subscribing an email list to (insert random vendors notifications list) is evil

Unless that mailing list is c-nsp ???  I appreciate that it's a cisco centric list, but why is subscribing c-nsp to the cisco psirt advisory list and less evil than subscribing the AusNOG list?


David
...