[AusNOG] [off-topic] Internet filter still looms large: Patten

[Kai]

Hehee, lemme do some quick calculations here, "too conflicted vs clueless", in this case too conflicted looks to be a MUCH better option.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Chaundy" <chris.chaundy at gmail.com>
To: "ausnog" <ausnog at ausnog.net>
Sent: Tuesday, 28 September, 2010 9:53:15 AM GMT +09:30 Darwin
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] [off-topic] Internet filter still looms large: Patten

While I agree, particularly on the last point, as it may have been
pointed out here previously, it simply will never happen as Kate Lundy
is way too conflicted to be able to take on this role (with no offense
intended to anyone).

On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Kai <vk6ksj at westnet.com.au> wrote:
> Sorry for another OT post, but, no one wants to be censored soooooo why is Conroy still pushing for it? Conroy can't keep his own work phone safe, how can he be trusted with this?!
>
> Internet filter still looms large: Patten
> itwire.com/it-policy-news/regulation/42127-internet-filter-still-looms-large-patten
>
> "So you don’t simply – because you get a lot of criticism – say 'oh well, I am going to run away from that policy'," he said.
>
> I'd seriously like to be a fly on the wall in his office, or wherever he meets whoever it is who are lobbying him for this.
>
> Between him and Richard Alston we probly have the most technologically ignorant senators in tech oriented jobs. Sack him and hire Kate Lundy, she actually has a clue.
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog