[AusNOG] NBN must avoid becoming 'failed state'

[Roland Chan]

Good plan. Shame about the Internet.  :)

I wonder whether a higher barrier to entry would scare off the smaller
players. It's an open question: is the minimum that my namesake
advocates at a higher cost that would allow the NBN to be feasible?
It's not like it's the first time commercial concerns overrode the
security on T'Internet.




On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Kai <vk6ksj at westnet.com.au> wrote:
> ...and here's the URL with all the optional stuff removed:
> http://www.itnews.com.au/News/232471,nbn-must-avoid-becoming-failed-state.aspx
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andrew Oskam" <percy at th3interw3bs.net>
> To: "ausnog at ausnog.net List" <ausnog at ausnog.net>
> Sent: Friday, 17 September, 2010 3:23:01 PM GMT +09:30 Darwin
> Subject: [AusNOG] NBN must avoid becoming 'failed state'
>
>
> http://www.itnews.com.au/News/232471,nbn-must-avoid-becoming-failed-state.aspx?eid=3&edate=20100917&utm_source=20100917_PM&utm_medium=newsletter&utm_campaign=daily_newsletter&eaddr=blue.flayme@gmail.com
>
>
> Just seen this pop up. Was a very interesting read and I agree with Roland on the matter.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Andrew Oskam
>
> E percy at th3interw3bs.net
>
>
> NOTICE:
>
> These comments are my own personal opinions only and do not necessarily reflect the positions or opinions of my employer or their affiliates. All comments are based upon my current knowledge and my own personal experiences. You should conduct independent tests to verify the validity of any statements made in this email before basing any decisions upon those statements.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>