[AusNOG] [pacnog] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group

[Betson Ifamilik]

I conger to the points being raised regarding security issues we all maybe
of a victim of. But generally speaking, in terms of security; I don't see a
secure system one can or may have says that its totally secure. We all know
the idea behind the scene that not a secure system in this world has been
secured, unless one stays on the system 24/7 for tracking and issue on their
LAN to spot and intruder. On the contrary; this is something that I believe
ICANN, ITU along with APNIC and its allies such as RIPE, AFRINIC, ARIN, and
LARNICs should really tackle into for the benefit of the network community.
Thanks! Just sharing my two cents here..




-----Original Message-----
From: pacnog-bounces at pacnog.org [mailto:pacnog-bounces at pacnog.org] On Behalf
Of pita at connect.com.fj
Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2010 6:51 PM
To: Franck Martin; pacnog-bounces at pacnog.org; Skeeve Stevens
Cc: ausnog at ausnog.net; apnic-talk at apnic.net; nznog; pacnog at pacnog.org
Subject: Re: [pacnog] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group

Some folks just likeshooting down other organisations and missinmg the
issues

Can the contribution be more on the issues otherwise take it elsewhere

Keep the minds open as there are some real valid and serious issues here. 

So to start with,you can contribute on the issues raised or why the study is
needed?

One of the commonly supported ideals is having competition. 

Is this an issue if organised well?

How about security.. Can we all live it to system?

I would really like to hear good strong arguments for both sides

Can such actions finally bring the sides to consolidate and make changes?

Thanks for the contribution
Fred


------Original Message------
From: Franck Martin
Sender: pacnog-bounces at pacnog.org
To: Skeeve Stevens
Cc: nznog
Cc: apnic-talk at apnic.net
Cc: ausnog at ausnog.net
Cc: pacnog at pacnog.org
Subject: Re: [pacnog] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group
Sent: Feb 27, 2010 11:12 AM

When I see Yet Another ITU Initiative (YAII tm), I just go to
http://www.itu.int/spam/

Then I know, they'll make lot of noise, get everyone excited and wasting
their time, get governments officials barking at the wrong tree, for the
same results as above.

What did we have so far?
-SPAM
-DNS
-NGN
-Security

All of the above are less and less relevant for ITU, while the Internet
Community and the industry are still tackling these problems with some
results and with far less resources.

Franck Martin 
http://www.avonsys.com/ 
http://www.facebook.com/Avonsys 
twitter: FranckMartin Avonsys 


----- Original Message -----
From: "Skeeve Stevens" <Skeeve at eintellego.net>
To: apnic-talk at apnic.net, ausnog at ausnog.net, "nznog"
<nznog at list.waikato.ac.nz>, pacnog at pacnog.org
Sent: Friday, 26 February, 2010 5:08:19 PM
Subject: [pacnog] RIPE NCC Position On The ITU IPv6 Group

This is an FYI for those interested.  Btw, RIPE NCC is the European version
of APNIC for those that don't know.

The ITU are looking at bypassing the RIR's (Ripe, APNIC, ARIN, AFRINIC,
LACNIC) and becoming their own numbering authority.  Clearly this is not the
desired option as the structure already exists for exactly what they want to
do, but rather than regionally, they want to do it per country.... for who
knows what reason.


_______________________________________________
pacnog mailing list
pacnog at pacnog.org
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/pacnog


Sent via BlackBerryR from Vodafone.
_______________________________________________
pacnog mailing list
pacnog at pacnog.org
http://mailman.apnic.net/mailman/listinfo/pacnog