[AusNOG] Packet loss from Internode to anything via Equinix Peering?

[Nathan Brookfield]

I can certainly replicate it . . . :(

Nathan at core-bdr-1-1:~$ nslookup www.internode.on.net
Server:    202.130.32.10
Address 1: 202.130.32.10 ns1.sau.net.au

Name:      www.internode.on.net
Address 1: 203.16.214.27 pubweb.internode.on.net
Nathan at core-bdr-1-1:~$ show ip bgp 203.16.214.27
BGP routing table entry for 203.16.208.0/21
Paths: (7 available, best #4, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
  Advertised to non peer-group peers:
  202.130.33.1 202.130.35.1 202.130.35.108 202.130.35.109
  17819 4739
    202.167.228.20 from 202.167.228.126 (202.167.228.126)
      Origin IGP, localpref 205, valid, external
      Community: 17819:65220 17819:65222
      Last update: Fri Jun  4 15:28:55 2010

  9482 17819 4739
    202.62.142.83 from 202.62.142.83 (202.62.144.2)
      Origin IGP, localpref 145, valid, external
      Community: 9482:34210 17819:1000 17819:65220 17819:65222
      Last update: Fri Jun  4 15:30:06 2010

  4826 4739
    114.31.200.125 from 114.31.200.125 (114.31.192.3)
      Origin IGP, localpref 145, valid, external
      Community: 4826:5203 4826:6510
      Last update: Fri Jun  4 15:29:14 2010

  17819 4739
    202.167.228.148 from 202.167.228.254 (202.167.228.254)
      Origin IGP, localpref 205, valid, external, best
      Community: 17819:65220 17819:65222
      Last update: Fri Jun  4 15:28:57 2010

  18398 4739
    218.100.2.17 from 218.100.2.62 (218.100.2.62)
      Origin IGP, localpref 200, valid, external
      Last update: Thu Jun 10 08:52:50 2010

  9942 7545 17819 4739
    125.254.8.53 from 125.254.8.53 (203.194.27.161)
      Origin IGP, localpref 155, valid, external
      Community: 9942:102 9942:204 9942:211 9942:8060
      Last update: Tue Jun  8 04:47:42 2010

  18398 4739
    218.100.2.17 from 218.100.2.1 (218.100.2.1)
      Origin IGP, localpref 200, valid, external
      Last update: Thu Jun 10 08:52:51 2010

Nathan at core-bdr-1-1:~$ ping 203.16.214.27
PING 203.16.214.27 (203.16.214.27) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 203.16.214.27: icmp_seq=1 ttl=60 time=26.9 ms
64 bytes from 203.16.214.27: icmp_seq=2 ttl=60 time=27.8 ms
64 bytes from 203.16.214.27: icmp_seq=3 ttl=60 time=27.7 ms
64 bytes from 203.16.214.27: icmp_seq=4 ttl=60 time=27.1 ms
64 bytes from 203.16.214.27: icmp_seq=5 ttl=60 time=27.0 ms
64 bytes from 203.16.214.27: icmp_seq=6 ttl=60 time=27.0 ms
64 bytes from 203.16.214.27: icmp_seq=8 ttl=60 time=27.1 ms
64 bytes from 203.16.214.27: icmp_seq=9 ttl=60 time=27.4 ms
64 bytes from 203.16.214.27: icmp_seq=11 ttl=60 time=27.2 ms
64 bytes from 203.16.214.27: icmp_seq=12 ttl=60 time=27.4 ms
64 bytes from 203.16.214.27: icmp_seq=13 ttl=60 time=26.9 ms
64 bytes from 203.16.214.27: icmp_seq=14 ttl=60 time=27.1 ms
64 bytes from 203.16.214.27: icmp_seq=15 ttl=60 time=27.8 ms
64 bytes from 203.16.214.27: icmp_seq=16 ttl=60 time=24.2 ms
64 bytes from 203.16.214.27: icmp_seq=17 ttl=60 time=26.7 ms
64 bytes from 203.16.214.27: icmp_seq=20 ttl=60 time=27.5 ms
64 bytes from 203.16.214.27: icmp_seq=21 ttl=60 time=27.2 ms
64 bytes from 203.16.214.27: icmp_seq=22 ttl=60 time=26.9 ms
^C
--- 203.16.214.27 ping statistics ---
22 packets transmitted, 18 received, 18% packet loss, time 21032ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 24.281/27.088/27.809/0.756 ms
Nathan at core-bdr-1-1:~$

From: ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Jonathan Thorpe
Sent: Thursday, 10 June 2010 1:21 PM
To: ausnog at ausnog.net
Subject: [AusNOG] Packet loss from Internode to anything via Equinix Peering?

Hi All,

We use Internode in the office and have observed a fair bit of consistent packet loss today. My first thoughts were it was the firmware upgrade I did to one of our core routers last night, but that doesn't appear to be the case :)

After some investigation, it would appear that there is loss between Internode and Equinix Peering in Sydney - not just to our network, but others that route via this (e.g. TPG).

Has anyone else observed any packet loss today from Internode to Equinix, or is there possibly something else here?

Kind Regards,
Jonathan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20100610/83a20756/attachment.html>