[AusNOG] Google creepier than Conroy?

[Noel Butler]

On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 08:14 +0930, Mark Newton wrote:

> 
> 
> On 01/06/2010, at 7:31 AM, Noel Butler wrote:
> 
> 
> > Actually, no, that would be a good idea, for when  the ACMA run out
> > of money, to easily locate and prosecute the wifi AP operators for
> > operating with[out] a carrier license
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> (deep breath)
> 
> 
> 
> Okay, Noel.  Please, tells us:  Why does an open WiFi provider need a
> carrier
> license?
> 
> 
> Your time starts... now.
> 

aww forgive me for being a day late, I'm not well (no comments from
peanut gallery), so avoiding looking at bright lights.


if you provide internet access that crosses the boundary of your
property, you need one, be it charged or non charged access.
 Property is IIRC defined as home= land boundary, unit = unit walls
boundary, shop = shop property, IOW, not the entire complex.
unless they changed this in the past five or six years which knowing the
ACMA, I sincerely doubt.

(I was an early member of bris mesh, much debate about offering access
to the net as is being mentioned here, the committee at the time went
through all the legal angles and were told this.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20100602/807725dc/attachment.html>