[AusNOG] Why No Form Of Censorship Is A Good Thing

[Andrew Cox]

Surely if they have the original there ought to be someway to lift the 
permanent marker without affecting the printed ink?
Or vice versa, something to display the printer ink on the rear side of 
the document without moving the permanent marker.

Maybe I've just been watching too much CSI.

- Andrew

On 23/07/2010 12:02 PM, Mark Newton wrote:
> On 23/07/2010, at 11:55 AM, Kai wrote:
>
>    
>> This is the kinda article I'd expect to see in China or something... ~sigh~
>>
>> No Minister: 90% of web snoop document censored to stop 'premature unnecessary debate'
>> http://www.smh.com.au/technology/technology-news/no-minister-90-of-web-snoop-document-censored-to-stop--premature-unnecessary-debate-20100722-10mxo.html
>>      
> Commentary this morning on twitter questions how long 'til Wikileaks publishes
> the unredacted version of that document.  Perhaps they oughtn't have bothered
> censoring it.
>
> (See "Streisand Effect": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect )
>
>
>     - mark
>
> --
> Mark Newton                               Email:  newton at internode.com.au (W)
> Network Engineer                          Email:  newton at atdot.dotat.org  (H)
> Internode Pty Ltd                         Desk:   +61-8-82282999
> "Network Man" - Anagram of "Mark Newton"  Mobile: +61-416-202-223
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>