[AusNOG] Junior techs

[Andrew Oskam]

True, But a change of scenery never hurt anyone. Who knows..might 
futureproof the community...could be a change for the better.

I personally would even donate to keep the site running. If it's a 
community effort than it could be self sustaining.


Andrew Oskam

E  percy at th3interw3bs.net


NOTICE:

These comments are my own personal opinions only and do not necessarily 
reflect the positions or opinions of my employer or their affiliates. 
All comments are based upon my current knowledge and my own personal 
experiences. You should conduct independent tests to verify the validity 
of any statements made in this email before basing any decisions upon 
those statements.




On 5/07/10 2:59 PM, Andrew Cox wrote:
> Andrew:
> I agree, although I don't see the harm in having the occasional 
> off-topic discussions here, if it's such a big problem then we might 
> as well move things elsewhere.
> It's hardly a large volume of emails to sort through currently thou, 
> in comparison have a look at the nanog mailing list.
>
> Bruce:
> Given (based on archives) this is your 4th on list post in the last 4 
> years why does it even bother you?
> You're complaining about lack of constructive contribution yet haven't 
> provided any notable 'signal' (professional or opinion) yourself.
>
> - Andrew
>
> On 5/07/2010 1:51 PM, Andrew Oskam wrote:
>> I still in support of a forum medium as the community portal and 
>> having the ausnog mail list remain specifically for Network Operation 
>> matters.
>>
>> The forums are good place to reference something you say donkeys 
>> months back and wanted to reference it without having to return 
>> folders upon folders of emails and then trying to decipher and sort 
>> the insignificant emails.
>>
>> Forums also offer some kind of moderation - should it be needed.
>>
>>
>> Andrew Oskam
>>
>> E percy at th3interw3bs.net
>>
>>
>> NOTICE:
>>
>> These comments are my own personal opinions only and do not 
>> necessarily reflect the positions or opinions of my employer or their 
>> affiliates. All comments are based upon my current knowledge and my 
>> own personal experiences. You should conduct independent tests to 
>> verify the validity of any statements made in this email before 
>> basing any decisions upon those statements.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5/07/10 1:43 PM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
>>> It has been suggested we have a ausnog-chat list, but apparently 
>>> some are against it.... I'd prefer that.
>>>
>>> Or leave this as the chat list and setup 'ausnog-ops'  list?
>>>
>>> ...Skeeve
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Skeeve Stevens, CEO/Technical Director
>>> eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists
>>> skeeve at eintellego.net  /www.eintellego.net
>>> Phone: 1300 753 383, Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
>>> Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 /skype://skeeve
>>> www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve  ; facebook.com/eintellego
>>> -- 
>>> NOC, NOC, who's there?
>>>
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net  [mailto:ausnog-
>>>> bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Bruce Morgan
>>>> Sent: Monday, 5 July 2010 1:11 PM
>>>> To: Peter Childs; Karl Kloppenborg
>>>> Cc:ausnog at ausnog.net
>>>> Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Junior techs
>>>>
>>>> Is AUSNOG relevent for network operators anymore? The SN ratio is
>>>> extremely
>>>> low.
>>>>
>>>> Facebook would be more appropriate for current posts. Why not form a
>>>> group
>>>> and post there and leave AUSNOG for relevant Network Operational
>>>> matters?
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> Bruce
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20100705/0f1ac1a8/attachment.html>