[AusNOG] Urgent - Pacnet NOC contact (with BGP clue)

[Skeeve Stevens]

The AFP is now involved - so let's see what happens now.

I must say, the AFP agent understood exactly what the issue was, BGP and all. Very impressed.


...Skeeve (from the Gorillaz concert in Melbourne)

--
From the Blackberry Bold 9700 of Skeeve Stevens

From: Matt Hope [mailto:matt.hope at nicta.com.au]
Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2010 09:51 PM
To: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net <ausnog at lists.ausnog.net>
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Urgent - Pacnet NOC contact (with BGP clue)


If you, or your customer is a AusCERT member, then this is likely something they can help with - if only to assist with legal proceedings.

AusCERT do have a 24x7 members-only contact line, members can see the details here: https://www.auscert.org.au/render.html?it=5141


 - Matt

On 10/12/10 19:59, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
So, to update.

After finally getting a Pacnet engineer who understood BGP and the issue (and was referring to my initial email to AusNOG), the engineer was instructed by his boss (don’t have a name) to tell me to call APNIC.... but couldn’t tell me what they expected APNIC to do.

I informed the Pacnet engineer (Ramon) that if they keep allowing AINS to announce the ranges (see below) then they are party to the Denial of Service that is going on and in turn are committing a criminal act as well.

Btw... the ranges I noted: 180.189.136.0/22 and 175.45.144.0/20 are being announced by AINS as /24’s for maximum disruption effect.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20101211/191b6220/attachment.html>