[AusNOG] NBN Co CEO Quigley Speech 20100818
Matt Howell
mattho at hostworks.com.au
Thu Aug 19 23:07:31 EST 2010
What is your budget? Talk isn't exactly cheap in this part of the electoral cycle.
Matt Howell
Technical Specialist - Networks
340 Findon Road, Kidman Park, SA 5025
T: +61 8 8461 4845 F: +61 8 8461 4899 E: mattho at hostworks.com.au
W: www.hostworks.com.au
Hostworks - Leader in Solutions to the online and digital media industry
Please consider the environment when printing this email
-----Original Message-----
From: ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Stephen Carter
Sent: Thursday, 19 August 2010 5:32 PM
To: 'Darren.Moss at em3.com.au'; 'technical at halenet.com.au'; 'percy at th3interw3bs.net'; 'jason at bigair.net.au'
Cc: 'Skeeve at eintellego.net'; 'ausnog at ausnog.net'
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] NBN Co CEO Quigley Speech 20100818
I wish there was a journalist that would write a good article before it is to late
Stephen Carter
Director
Working Technology
Level 20 - 31 Market Street - Sydney - 2000
Tel: 02 9475 7777 - Fax: 02 9475 7788
----- Original Message -----
From: Darren Moss <Darren.Moss at em3.com.au>
To: Stephen Carter; Tim McCullagh <technical at halenet.com.au>; Andrew Oskam <percy at th3interw3bs.net>; Jason Ashton <jason at bigair.net.au>
Cc: Skeeve Stevens <Skeeve at eintellego.net>; ausnog at ausnog.net <ausnog at ausnog.net>
Sent: Thu Aug 19 17:56:17 2010
Subject: RE: [AusNOG] NBN Co CEO Quigley Speech 20100818
Thanks.
I would rather see my children receive a world-class education, my Mother receive good healthcare, and my family have a future without massive debt.
There are other options and not many outside this list is talking about them.
Perhaps the government (of the day) could consult some of the experts and organisations on this list to build something that is:
A) Affordable
B) Meets our needs for the next 5-10 years.
If technology is so rapidly changing, let's not try to pre-empt or meet that future expectation all in one go, all right now, especially when we can't actually afford it.
Regards,
Darren Moss
General Manager
Australia and New Zealand
[p] 1300 131 083 [f] 03 9017 2287
[e] Darren.Moss at em3.com.au [w] www.em3.com.au
em3 People and Technology | Managed Technology Experts
postal: PO Box 2333, Moorabbin VIC 3189
New Zealand Airedale Street, Auckland City
postal: PO Box 39573, Howick 2045
[p] 09 887 0550 [f] 09 887 0273
-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Carter [mailto:Stephen.Carter at workingtech.com]
Sent: Thursday, 19 August 2010 5:31 PM
To: Darren Moss; Tim McCullagh; Andrew Oskam; Jason Ashton
Cc: Skeeve Stevens; ausnog at ausnog.net
Subject: RE: [AusNOG] NBN Co CEO Quigley Speech 20100818
Well said.
-----Original Message-----
From: Darren Moss [mailto:Darren.Moss at em3.com.au]
Sent: Thursday, 19 August 2010 5:26 PM
To: Tim McCullagh; Andrew Oskam; Jason Ashton
Cc: Stephen Carter; Skeeve Stevens; ausnog at ausnog.net
Subject: RE: [AusNOG] NBN Co CEO Quigley Speech 20100818
I agree, where is the business case?
Does every home actually need FTTH ??
At first I thought maybe Mr Abbott was way off the mark, but after thinking this through (mainly the cost) perhaps they have a valid point - for now.
I agree with fibre to business / DC / hospitals / schools / high concentration of users, but I think it's going to be overkill + a waste of money to fibre up for home use (yes I would like fibre in my home, but no I don't need it).
This notion of clinical treatment over webcams on the NBN is a load of rubbish.
$43B is very large sum, and that's only what we know now. What happens if it turns in another pink batts/BER/Solar panels exercise ???
Why not put the money into hospitals, aged and health care (face it, we are all going to need it at some stage) and focus on the services our community really needs.
Regards,
Darren Moss
General Manager
Australia and New Zealand
[p] 1300 131 083 [f] 03 9017 2287
[e] Darren.Moss at em3.com.au [w] www.em3.com.au
em3 People and Technology | Managed Technology Experts
postal: PO Box 2333, Moorabbin VIC 3189
New Zealand Airedale Street, Auckland City
postal: PO Box 39573, Howick 2045
[p] 09 887 0550 [f] 09 887 0273
-----Original Message-----
From: ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net [mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Tim McCullagh
Sent: Thursday, 19 August 2010 5:08 PM
To: Andrew Oskam; Jason Ashton
Cc: Stephen Carter; Skeeve Stevens; ausnog at ausnog.net
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] NBN Co CEO Quigley Speech 20100818
----- Original Message -----
From: Andrew Oskam
To: Jason Ashton
Cc: Stephen Carter ; Skeeve Stevens ; ausnog at ausnog.net
> But my question is -
> What would you have us do?
Build a business case and address areas of need.
>What do you have to offer that doesn't have Australia using a dying
>copper network
I see this comment regularly and I just wonder how many people are in a positon to make that statement. I would suggest not many. In fact it probably comes down to less than 1000 australia wide that would have enough of an understanding of the network and the issues to make it, and I doubt to
many of them would be on this list. The copper network is not dying and
for many and probably the majority of internet users is will provide solutions that meet their needs for many years into the future. The funny thing about the statement that the copper is dying is that some of the oldest cables still have the same transmission properties thay did when they were installed. In many cases dying refers to technical obsolecense such as transmission loss and the like. As someone that maintained copper for a long time, I can tell you that many of the issues with the copper network have more to do with maintenance practices than the cable itself. Many of the technical limitations can be overcome by moving fibre to nodes further into the network and taking one step at a time, rather than trying to take a leap of faith to the first solution that has been proposed.
> and being controlled by the Telstra monopoly?
The solution to that is regulation. In saying that, if we want to see investments in upgraded fixed line networks then the carriers need to be able to recover a return on their investments. All the whinging about Telstra quite frankly is a bit over the top. If Telstra was ripping customers off then why is it that there are not competing networks being rolled out and why does Optus offer ADSL services where it already owns a HFC network? Where is the incentive for Telstra to upgrade its network when
LSS payments are as low as $2.50 per month. That is just something to
think about. At the end of the day any investment whether it is Telstra or
NBNco or others needs to get a return to justify the capital outlay.
Installing a DSLAM should hardly be classified as infrastructure. In essence they are the replacement of dial ports. The only real differnence is that they need to be installed in exchanges or close to exchanges so as to minimise line loss.
> I find the suggestion that we make do with what we have unacceptable.
I find the solution to spend $7500 per home passed unacceptable to (based on
tassy). We need to find an affordable solution NBN isn't it. A business
case would be a fine start
> I also find it unacceptable to suggest people use wireless as if it
> were a fixed-line service.
No one is suggesting that, but consumers are speaking with their wallets and
are doing it now. In fact I recon that is probably more of a problem. The
wireless networks will degrade.
> Wireless is great and all - but let's be serious here. It simply
> doesn't cut it.
I am not sure that is correct. It may not cut it for some of us, but for many it does provide a solution
> We can't sit here with our hands behind our back as copper draws
> closer to it's demise.
I doubt that the necessary upgrades will not happen. Based on the same changes since the dial days. There is still a lot of research going into copper.
> but apparently we can't allow the govt to lay the foundations for a
> better network for the future. So what can we do?
There needs to be a business case and a pricing model relaesed so that consumers can decide whether they want to pay more for their internet for the additional benefits it will provide. As long as night follows day any FTTH network will cost more than the current ADSL offerings. The proof is in the currently released pricing for the tassie offerings. The proof can also be easly arived at by bringing up any loan repayment calculator and working out what the payments would be on $7500 per month over 20 to 40 years.
> In my experience - the bag is full of those want faster speeds,
> there's those that want a stable connection, and then you have those
> that want ANY form of a connection.
In my experience speaking with end users their primary focus is on how much
it will cost and how much they can fit into their budgets. It is the same
argument with pay tv etc. In fact most would like paytv but because of their budget priorities a lot choose not to. The same applies to broadband.
regards
Tim
_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
#####################################################################################
Scanned by MailMarshal - Marshal8e6's comprehensive email content security solution.
Download a free evaluation of MailMarshal at www.marshal.com #####################################################################################
#####################################################################################
Scanned by MailMarshal - Marshal8e6's comprehensive email content security solution.
Download a free evaluation of MailMarshal at www.marshal.com #####################################################################################
_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
More information about the AusNOG
mailing list