[AusNOG] Carrier Independent Peering Exchange

[Skeeve Stevens]

What about penalties for providing a webpage with instructions on how to circumvent it?

If there is no penalties or law against it - and if the ways around it as published VERY widely - then maybe it could de-rail the government's attempts to do it in the first place.

Thoughts?

...Skeeve

--
Skeeve Stevens, CEO/Technical Director
eintellego Pty Ltd - The Networking Specialists
skeeve at eintellego.net / www.eintellego.net
Phone: 1300 753 383, Fax: (+612) 8572 9954
Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 / skype://skeeve
www.linkedin.com/in/skeeve ; facebook.com/eintellego
--
NOC, NOC, who's there?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net [mailto:ausnog-
> bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of Simon Horman
> Sent: Thursday, 17 December 2009 11:54 AM
> To: Matthew Moyle-Croft
> Cc: ausnog at ausnog.net
> Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Carrier Independent Peering Exchange
> 
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 11:12:02AM +1100, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 05:54:15PM +1030, Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > I don't feel the time is yet there.   It may come next year, but
> > > rushing forward now may make something we don't want to happen
> > > inevitable.
> >
> > I wonder what if any sanctions might be put in place for people
> > who develop code or distribute documentation that aids bypassing
> > the filter. And how broad any such rules might be.
> 
> As per another email in this thread, apparently there are no
> penalties prescribed for circumventing the filter. So my musings
> seem to be moot.
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog