[AusNOG] Reply to list or sender ?

[Bevan Slattery]

I'm happy to get it back to how it was.  I wasn't a big fan of it
myself, but thought we do what was suggested.  I tend to think the
inconvenience of having a few peoples names on an address field is
better than sending what was meant to be a personal response to the list
unexpectedly.

So - in the words of Elvis, I think we shall "return to sender" (unless
enough violently object).

[b] 

-----Original Message-----
From: ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net
[mailto:ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net] On Behalf Of David Hughes
Sent: Friday, 7 August 2009 10:10 PM
To: ausnog at ausnog.net
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Reply to list or sender ?


You know, the number of complaints I get about the "reply to list"  
setup is amazing.  I also think it's not ideal.  I'd be happier with the
list setup with reply to sender (as is nanog, c-nsp, ietf etc etc  
etc).   Thoughts?


David
...

On 07/08/2009, at 5:50 PM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:

> Was supposed to be a privmsg, but true anyway.

_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog