<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-signature">It was ages ago, but I think I saw from
time to time a combination of checkboxes on Draytek 120/130 itself
that makes it do "own" pppoe attempt in parallel with PPPoE
passthrough.</div>
<div class="moz-signature">Try to change from pppoe to static for
wan AND pppoe passthrough enabled?</div>
<div class="moz-signature"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-signature">Regards,</div>
<div class="moz-signature">Dmitry<br>
</div>
<div class="moz-signature"><br>
</div>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 22/06/2021 3:33 pm, Benjamin Ricardo
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:973FBD54AAA9674B9D262D36779FAAC601B77DB823@MAIN.acs.intra">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
medium)">
<style>@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}</style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi All,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Looking for some shared experience here.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">We’ve had a complaint from our NBN
wholesaler that our Draytek’s, which are configured in PPPoE
passthrough, are sending blank authentications to their Radius
server at a rate which is impacting their services.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Our standard deployment since about 2010
has been to deploy an xDSL type modem in PPPoE passthrough and
then use a router to send the authentication. Interestingly
we’ve never had this complaint before…<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Our work around was that our wholesaler
requires the credentials to be sent on a vlan so instead of
using the Draytek to handle the vlan-ing we changed the router
to insert the vlan (so the Draytek can be as noisy as it likes
and it doesn’t affect them)<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I’m wondering if others have also had this
experience with these devices… and what you did about it?<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Also, surely if the stupid Draytek is in
pppoe passthrough it should know not to try to authenticate
itself???<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Cheers,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Ben<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>