<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 21/11/2018 6:33 PM, Robert Hudson
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAOu9xNK=0CbLQy_GQ6aidpWgAc8Zph64nBz4afJaBrfNrZp-+g@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      <div dir="auto">I sent an email to my local (LNP) MP, who
        forwarded it to Dutton, who sent a letter back on lovely heavy
        paper stock.
        <div dir="auto"><br>
        </div>
        <div dir="auto">Dutton of course completely missed the point,
          not least of all because he wants to miss the point as it is
          inconvenient for his agenda).</div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Its a reasonable start, and good on you for writing the letter -
    Dutton of course will feel that you are completely missing the
    point, because you're both arguing different points. <br>
    <br>
    The important thing is that, if this thing is pushed back into
    Parliament, its the lower house MPs and Upper House Senators that
    will be voting on this, and probably voting along party lines.
    Neither you, now I, or anybody else on this list gets to participate
    in that vote.<br>
    <br>
    Minister Dutton is unlikely to change his mind, no matter how many
    people write to him - in his mind he's doing this to protect the
    people, and anyone thinking thats a poor idea must be against
    protecting the people. Also, now its a matter of pride and personal
    embarrassment if he was to back down now - so that is unlikely to
    happen, even if you manage to shake his private conviction that its
    all for the greater good.<br>
    <br>
    To influence that vote, letters and briefings to other MPs and
    senators on all sides, to work to influence each major Party (and
    the independents) view of the Bill is more likely to have an effect
    on the voting numbers.<br>
    <br>
    And FWIW, I've found arguments that lean towards demonstrating the
    measures are impractical, infeasible, risky, or likely to cause
    embarassment tend to be more powerful than arguments leaning on
    philosophy - arguments like "you shouldn't even be wanting to do
    this because we're a liberal democracy" aren't likely to wash as
    much as 'if thats what you're trying to achieve, doing like that
    won't work or is very risky because...' <br>
    <br>
    Paul.<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAOu9xNK=0CbLQy_GQ6aidpWgAc8Zph64nBz4afJaBrfNrZp-+g@mail.gmail.com">
      <div dir="auto">
        <div dir="auto"><br>
        </div>
        <div dir="auto">If anyone wants a scanned copy (could be useful
          for determining a point of weakness in the argument he and
          DOHA are pushing, I'm happy to share.</div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr">On Wed, 21 Nov. 2018, 5:18 pm Paul Brooks <<a
            href="mailto:pbrooks-ausnog@layer10.com.au"
            moz-do-not-send="true">pbrooks-ausnog@layer10.com.au</a>
          wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
          .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
          <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
            <div class="m_-4320473818714955642moz-cite-prefix">Thanks
              Rob. <br>
              In the latest, Dutton wants to speed up the Bill and have
              it passed "next week", and has apparently asked the PJCIS
              to cut short its evaluation, according to reporting of an
              interview on Sky News.<br>
              <br>
              <a
href="https://www.itnews.com.au/news/dutton-tries-to-speed-up-encryption-bill-515862"
                target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true">Dutton
                tries to speed up encryption bill</a><br>
              <br>
              (Point of clarification - that bit about smart and dumb
              criminals was while trying to explain the difference
              between a system having a capability that can be used by
              the operator to implement a "act or thing", and an
              operator actually using that capability in a particular
              instance against a particular target - and that the
              existence of the capability isn't and shouldn't be secret,
              even if the actual use in response to a warrant was still
              kept a secret.  That distinction has been difficult for
              the committee to understand without a simple
              illustration.)<br>
              <br>
              <br>
              Paul.<br>
              <br>
              <br>
              On 21/11/2018 2:00 PM, Robert Hudson wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote type="cite">
              <div dir="auto">(Not necessarily a direct response to
                Paul's email, just additional data for the thread).
                <div dir="auto"><br>
                </div>
                <div dir="auto">Traditional media are starting to pick
                  this up, and they're just parroting the govt position.
                  Macquarie Radio news at 8am ran a story on it this
                  morning, and it was all about Dutton saying he wants
                  the legislation passed quickly so they can catch more
                  terrorists.</div>
                <div dir="auto"><br>
                </div>
                <div dir="auto">Other than the point well made by Paul
                  Brooks that the only criminals who will be caught by
                  this are the dumb ones (there was a link made between
                  this proposed legislation and three potential
                  terrorists were were arrested - without this
                  legislation in place), and the smarter criminals (ie
                  those capable of tieing their own shoe laces) will
                  simply use software that is not subject to the
                  legislation, there is an extension - to break the
                  encryption WILL involve creating vulnerabilities
                  (there's simply no way around this), and those
                  vulnerabilities will then be available for criminals
                  (the bar may be higher than shoelaces, maybe they can
                  button their own shirts as well) to exploit and
                  compromise data that is legitimately encrypted.</div>
                <div dir="auto"><br>
                </div>
                <div dir="auto">In summary - there is no upside to this
                  proposed legislation as far as encryption goes, and
                  there is a significant potential downside.</div>
                <div dir="auto"><br>
                </div>
                <div dir="auto">It cannot be allowed to pass.</div>
              </div>
              <br>
              <div class="gmail_quote">
                <div dir="ltr">On Wed, 21 Nov. 2018, 12:09 pm Paul
                  Wilkins <<a href="mailto:paulwilkins369@gmail.com"
                    rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank"
                    moz-do-not-send="true">paulwilkins369@gmail.com</a>
                  wrote:<br>
                </div>
                <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                  .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                  <div dir="ltr">
                    <div dir="ltr">I'm wondering when the other shoe
                      will drop that the Bill enables mass collection
                      and analysis of metadata without any further
                      legislation needed. Or the implications that
                      metadata from multiple sources (phone
                      towers/CCTV/Social Media), lays the foundations
                      for the establishment of the machinery of a police
                      state. Of course, this will make prosecution of
                      crime straightforward (the police will only need
                      to correlate crime against a database of the
                      public's electronic fingerprints). However, such
                      powerful machinery can be used for oppressive
                      purposes, and the Bill is absent the checks and
                      balances consistent with the traditions and
                      institutions of Liberal Democracy.<br>
                       <br>
                      If one were cynical you might think the Bill's
                      outrageous overreach is deliberate, a Trumpist
                      ploy to enrage the unthinking. And when we see
                      critics of the Bill slandered for being weak on
                      terrorism, maybe not so wide of the mark or so
                      cynical.<br>
                      <br>
                      Kind regards<br>
                      <br>
                      Paul Wilkins<br>
                      <br>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                  <br>
                  <div class="gmail_quote">
                    <div dir="ltr">On Wed, 21 Nov 2018 at 04:15, Scott
                      Weeks <<a href="mailto:surfer@mauigateway.com"
                        rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer"
                        target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">surfer@mauigateway.com</a>>
                      wrote:<br>
                    </div>
                    <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                      .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
                      <br>
                      On Tue, 20 Nov 2018 at 18:12, Christian Heinrich<br>
                      <<a href="mailto:christian.heinrich@cmlh.id.au"
                        rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer"
                        target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">christian.heinrich@cmlh.id.au</a>>
                      wrote:<br>
                      > <a
href="https://www.news.com.au/national/victoria/news/victoria-police-arrest-three-people-allegedly-planning-a-terror-attack-in-melbourne/news-story/e6a92273b37dce750937e1e0f86a7dcd"
                        rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer
                        noreferrer" target="_blank"
                        moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.news.com.au/national/victoria/news/victoria-police-arrest-three-people-allegedly-planning-a-terror-attack-in-melbourne/news-story/e6a92273b37dce750937e1e0f86a7dcd</a><br>
                      > has quoted Mr Dutton on WhatsApp again but
                      from my reading WhatsApp<br>
                      > was not used in this specific case?<br>
                      <br>
                      This has now been alleged within<br>
                      <a
href="https://www.news.com.au/technology/gadgets/mobile-phones/unacceptable-risk-the-secret-way-terrorists-and-criminals-are-communicating/news-story/731ca32e7432601d6b3ce5ca4f34bf80"
                        rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer
                        noreferrer" target="_blank"
                        moz-do-not-send="true">https://www.news.com.au/technology/gadgets/mobile-phones/unacceptable-risk-the-secret-way-terrorists-and-criminals-are-communicating/news-story/731ca32e7432601d6b3ce5ca4f34bf80</a><br>
-----------------------------------------------------<br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      These stories read like gov't scare tactics. 
                      Scare people <br>
                      enough and they'll 'give up liberty for a little
                      safety'.<br>
                      They do not read like objective journalism.'<br>
                      <br>
                      How did they catch everyone without eliminating
                      privacy<br>
                      anyway?  Good ol' police work?<br>
                      <br>
                      scott<br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      _______________________________________________<br>
                      AusNOG mailing list<br>
                      <a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net"
                        rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer"
                        target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>
                      <a
                        href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog"
                        rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer
                        noreferrer" target="_blank"
                        moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                      _______________________________________________<br>
                      AusNOG mailing list<br>
                      <a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net"
                        rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer"
                        target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>
                      <a
                        href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog"
                        rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer
                        noreferrer" target="_blank"
                        moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><br>
                    </blockquote>
                  </div>
                  _______________________________________________<br>
                  AusNOG mailing list<br>
                  <a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net"
                    rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer"
                    target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>
                  <a
                    href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog"
                    rel="noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer noreferrer"
                    target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><br>
                </blockquote>
              </div>
              <br>
              <fieldset
                class="m_-4320473818714955642mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
              <br>
              <pre>_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
<a class="m_-4320473818714955642moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a>
<a class="m_-4320473818714955642moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a>
</pre>
            </blockquote>
            <p><br>
            </p>
          </div>
          _______________________________________________<br>
          AusNOG mailing list<br>
          <a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net" target="_blank"
            rel="noreferrer" moz-do-not-send="true">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>
          <a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog"
            rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank"
            moz-do-not-send="true">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <p><br>
    </p>
  </body>
</html>