<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body dir="auto">
The thing is. It’s a new development charge so it’s absolutely no different to paying Telstra $299 for a new line installation when you move into a premises with no active phone line.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>It’s for a property that has been built and has a lead in, they’re just connecting the first service at the new address.<br>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Why all the whinging? Had to be paid whether to Telstra or NBN, no difference except you’re getting an FTTP service.<br>
<br>
<div id="AppleMailSignature">Nathan Brookfield
<div>Chief Executive Officer</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Simtronic Technologies Pty Ltd</div>
<div><a href="http://www.simtronic.com.au">http://www.simtronic.com.au</a></div>
</div>
<div><br>
On 19 Mar 2018, at 22:58, Jason Leschnik <<a href="mailto:jason@leschnik.me">jason@leschnik.me</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
So George, make sure that fee gets paid as it makes the NBN look $300<br>
cheaper than it actually is.<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The whole NBN debate has always confused me. Without offsetting the cost how would either Government have afforded the NBN? The bill shock from $300 NDF is annoying to say the least but I've spent >$300 on some pretty stupid things in my life and I'm sure
there are others who would've paid a lot more than $300 to get FTTP/FTTN. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br>
<span>AusNOG mailing list</span><br>
<span><a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a></span><br>
<span><a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a></span><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>