<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
      charset=windows-1252">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p><font face="Arial">That's what I'd like to do, but TPG don't peer
        at NSW-IX or Megaport for that matter.  They are only at Pipe,
        unless they are secretly there and don't tell anyone...</font><br>
    </p>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 01/12/2018 10:33 AM, Mark Newton
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:B30F8802-283D-4985-A9C5-2C1A6A69DB11@atdot.dotat.org">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
        charset=windows-1252">
      Bilateral peering with TPG over the NSW-IX fabric should fix that.
      <div class=""><br class="">
      </div>
      <div class="">  - mark<br class="">
        <div><br class="">
          <blockquote type="cite" class="">
            <div class="">On Jan 12, 2018, at 7:46 AM, John Alexander
              <<a href="mailto:johna@wideband.net.au" class=""
                moz-do-not-send="true">johna@wideband.net.au</a>>
              wrote:</div>
            <br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
            <div class="">
              <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" class="">
                <p class=""><font class="" face="Arial">With this, does
                    anyone know of a way of keeping HE routes, but
                    excluding a specific one, namely TPG 7545 which is a
                    direct customer of HE. Traffic from them goes from
                    Syd -> LA -> Syd -> he peering -> me. 
                    I'd prefer to just make them stay at home so to
                    speak instead of going around the world.  We don't
                    peer at Pipe which would be the only other place to
                    connect to tpg.<br class="">
                  </font></p>
                <p class=""><font class="" face="Arial">John</font><br
                    class="">
                </p>
                <br class="">
                <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 01/11/2018 05:55 PM,
                  Nathan Le Nevez wrote:<br class="">
                </div>
                <blockquote type="cite"
                  cite="mid:88264440caab4d6d8074e5761848458f@lenevez.net.au"
                  class="">
                  <pre class="" wrap="">I assume it was Hurricane Electric...IPv6 routes are now at 21843 too

Nathan

-----Original Message-----
From: AusNOG [<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:ausnog-bounces@lists.ausnog.net" moz-do-not-send="true">mailto:ausnog-bounces@lists.ausnog.net</a>] On Behalf Of Paul Holmanskikh
Sent: Thursday, 11 January 2018 5:00 PM
To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ausnog@lists.ausnog.net" moz-do-not-send="true">ausnog@lists.ausnog.net</a>
Subject: [AusNOG] Megaport IX Sydney - Sudden grows in number of prefixes

G'day,

Number of prefixes we are receiving from Megaport IX in Sydeney suddenly jumped to 40493.
At lest 100% grow.  Any ideas what happened.


as_path count
36351   945
4739    909
9443    658


</pre>
                </blockquote>
              </div>
              _______________________________________________<br
                class="">
              AusNOG mailing list<br class="">
              <a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net" class=""
                moz-do-not-send="true">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br
                class="">
              <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><br
                class="">
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
        <br class="">
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>