<div dir="auto">Issues around vrf and kernel generated packets having wrong source address<div dir="auto">Bfd having wrong source address were int has multi IP</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 2 May 2017 6:49 PM, "Joseph Goldman" <<a href="mailto:joe@apcs.com.au">joe@apcs.com.au</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
Mostly a re-write of a lot of core processes to bring them much more
multi-threaded, to utilise those massive core count CCR's.<br>
<br>
Biggest complaints atm from my understanding:<br>
<br>
1) BGP processing, bringing in massive amounts of routes and parsing
over them is single core to an extent<br>
2) TCP streams seem to be limited based on a single CPU pushing 100%
and allowing 1gbit through (single stream limitation)<br>
<br>
Not sure if these are fixed or just workarounds put in but these
were big 'coming in V7' features.<br>
<br>
<div class="m_8748088943423364171moz-cite-prefix">On 02/05/17 17:04, Alex Samad wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">Hi
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Nice try but supposedly there is a new kernel release in V7
and some features can't be fixed in V6 ... Well atleast thats
what I have been told....</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>A</div>
</div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 2 May 2017 at 16:00, Nathanael
Bettridge <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nathanael@prodigy.com.au" target="_blank">nathanael@prodigy.com.au</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="white" link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="EN-AU">
<div class="m_8748088943423364171m_-1370031005690671447WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d">I
get the impression v7 is used as their dev platform
at this point.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d">MT
will tout something as coming in v7 and you’ll after
a while see it incrementally rolled into the v6
releases.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d"> </span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 4.0pt">
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #e1e1e1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext" lang="EN-US">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext" lang="EN-US"> AusNOG [mailto:<a href="mailto:ausnog-bounces@lists.ausnog.net" target="_blank">ausnog-bounces@lists.a<wbr>usnog.net</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Joseph Goldman<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, 1 May 2017 5:14 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:ausnog@lists.ausnog.net" target="_blank">ausnog@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [AusNOG] Is VyOS dead?
What is everyone using for virtual
routers/firewalls?</span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Since
people seem to be able to quantify progress on vyOS
- I'd say vyOS. ROS v7 is still in myth status at
this point.</p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 01/05/17 16:54, Alex Samad
wrote:</p>
</div>
<blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 1 May 2017 at 13:06,
Brad Peczka <<a href="mailto:brad@bradpeczka.com" target="_blank">brad@bradpeczka.com</a>>
wrote:</p>
<blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm">
<p>If you're looking to pay for a product,
the Brocade vRouter is well worth a look.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Otherwise - vyOS is far from dead and
buried, but rewrites take time and there's
only so many hours in a day. As someone
else has said, the IRC channel is quite
active and there's definitely progress
being made.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>-Brad.</p>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
Wonder what will come first ROS V7 or vyOS
rewrite ?</p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">A</p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<br>
<br>
</p>
<pre>______________________________<wbr>_________________</pre>
<pre>AusNOG mailing list</pre>
<pre><a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net" target="_blank">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a></pre>
<pre><a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" target="_blank">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailma<wbr>n/listinfo/ausnog</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal">
<span style="color:windowtext"></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
______________________________<wbr>_________________
AusNOG mailing list
<a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net" target="_blank">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a>
<a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailma<wbr>n/listinfo/ausnog</a>
</blockquote></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div></blockquote></div></div>