<div dir="auto">Issues around vrf and kernel generated packets having wrong source address<div dir="auto">Bfd having wrong source address were int has multi IP</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 2 May 2017 6:49 PM, "Joseph Goldman" <<a href="mailto:joe@apcs.com.au">joe@apcs.com.au</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    Mostly a re-write of a lot of core processes to bring them much more
    multi-threaded, to utilise those massive core count CCR's.<br>
    <br>
    Biggest complaints atm from my understanding:<br>
    <br>
    1) BGP processing, bringing in massive amounts of routes and parsing
    over them is single core to an extent<br>
    2) TCP streams seem to be limited based on a single CPU pushing 100%
    and allowing 1gbit through (single stream limitation)<br>
    <br>
    Not sure if these are fixed or just workarounds put in but these
    were big 'coming in V7' features.<br>
    <br>
    <div class="m_8748088943423364171moz-cite-prefix">On 02/05/17 17:04, Alex Samad wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">Hi 
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>Nice try but supposedly there is a new kernel release in V7
          and some features can't be fixed in V6 ...  Well atleast thats
          what I have been told....</div>
        <div><br>
        </div>
        <div>A</div>
      </div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On 2 May 2017 at 16:00, Nathanael
          Bettridge <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nathanael@prodigy.com.au" target="_blank">nathanael@prodigy.com.au</a>></span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div bgcolor="white" link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="EN-AU">
              <div class="m_8748088943423364171m_-1370031005690671447WordSection1">
                <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d">I
                    get the impression v7 is used as their dev platform
                    at this point.</span></p>
                <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d">MT
                    will tout something as coming in v7 and you’ll after
                    a while see it incrementally rolled into the v6
                    releases.</span></p>
                <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:#1f497d"> </span></p>
                <div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 4.0pt">
                  <div>
                    <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #e1e1e1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
                      <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext" lang="EN-US">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;color:windowtext" lang="EN-US"> AusNOG [mailto:<a href="mailto:ausnog-bounces@lists.ausnog.net" target="_blank">ausnog-bounces@lists.a<wbr>usnog.net</a>]
                          <b>On Behalf Of </b>Joseph Goldman<br>
                          <b>Sent:</b> Monday, 1 May 2017 5:14 PM<br>
                          <b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:ausnog@lists.ausnog.net" target="_blank">ausnog@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>
                          <b>Subject:</b> Re: [AusNOG] Is VyOS dead?
                          What is everyone using for virtual
                          routers/firewalls?</span></p>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Since
                    people seem to be able to quantify progress on vyOS
                    - I'd say vyOS. ROS v7 is still in myth status at
                    this point.</p>
                  <div>
                    <p class="MsoNormal">On 01/05/17 16:54, Alex Samad
                      wrote:</p>
                  </div>
                  <blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
                    <div>
                      <div>
                        <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                        <div>
                          <p class="MsoNormal">On 1 May 2017 at 13:06,
                            Brad Peczka <<a href="mailto:brad@bradpeczka.com" target="_blank">brad@bradpeczka.com</a>>
                            wrote:</p>
                          <blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #cccccc 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm">
                            <p>If you're looking to pay for a product,
                              the Brocade vRouter is well worth a look.</p>
                            <p> </p>
                            <p>Otherwise - vyOS is far from dead and
                              buried, but rewrites take time and there's
                              only so many hours in a day. As someone
                              else has said, the IRC channel is quite
                              active and there's definitely progress
                              being made.</p>
                            <p> </p>
                            <p>Regards,</p>
                            <p>-Brad.</p>
                          </blockquote>
                        </div>
                        <p class="MsoNormal"><br>
                          Wonder what will come first ROS V7 or vyOS
                          rewrite ?</p>
                      </div>
                      <div>
                        <p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
                      </div>
                      <div>
                        <p class="MsoNormal">A</p>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                    <p class="MsoNormal"><br>
                      <br>
                      <br>
                    </p>
                    <pre>______________________________<wbr>_________________</pre>
<pre>AusNOG mailing list</pre>
<pre><a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net" target="_blank">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a></pre>
<pre><a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" target="_blank">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailma<wbr>n/listinfo/ausnog</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="MsoNormal">



<span style="color:windowtext"></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>


______________________________<wbr>_________________

AusNOG mailing list

<a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net" target="_blank">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a>

<a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailma<wbr>n/listinfo/ausnog</a>


</blockquote></div>
</div>



</blockquote>
</div></blockquote></div></div>