<html><head></head><body>It already is....all the ports on all the NBN CPE are GigE capable. We can have the same thing with a few keystrokes into the billing system, no infrastructure change required...just a change of accounting.<br>
<br>
It's all GigE capable....the only difference is we're not using it like that. And what a difference between this in NZ, and the shitstorm here when Quigley announced it was all GigE capable back in the day. <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 8 September 2016 6:48:03 AM GMT+08:00, Mark Newton <newton@atdot.dotat.org> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail">On Sep 8, 2016, at 8:07 AM, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:<br /><br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;"> This is where the NBN went wrong from day 1. It should have just<br /> delivered 1G for all the fibre services. There was never any need<br /> to do multiple speeds. Pay for the bits delivered.<br /></blockquote><br /><br />Aren’t the bits already being paid for if there’s a billing model based on the CPE port CIR?<br /><br />The CVC is a bigger deal for the NBN: Financial engineering to produce artificial scarcity. Because clearly that’s what all the customers, ISPs, politicians, and voters actually wanted.<br /><br /> - mark<br /><br /><br /><hr /><br />AusNOG mailing list<br />AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net<br /><a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><br /></pre></blockquote></div><br>
-- <br>
Paul Brooks<br>
Trident Subsea Cables<br>
<br>
Sent unplugged </body></html>