<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 2016-06-08 1458, Mark Newton wrote:<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:A7D0862D-7DE2-4504-B198-6AC1FF491216@atdot.dotat.org"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
On Jun 8, 2016, at 2:55 PM, Simon Attwell <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:simon@attwell.net" class="">simon@attwell.net</a>>
wrote:<br class="">
<br>
<div>
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div dir="ltr" class="">
<div class="gmail_default"
style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small">Therefore
one must assume that IPv6 is metered.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br class="">
</div>
<div>Quotas are really very big now, compared to the state of the
art when unmetering was first deployed (3 gig cap!).</div>
<div><br class="">
</div>
<div>If you’re on a 100Gbyte+ plan, does that actually matter
anymore?</div>
<div><br class="">
</div>
<div> - mark</div>
</blockquote>
<tt>The largest capped plan I've seen available here is a mere
1000GB. Currently, at my apartment with 3 people, we're pushing </tt><tt>450GB/mo
on a light month and over a terabyte on heavier months, and that's
on miserly ADSL2+ 20/1 </tt><tt><tt>all thanks to YouTube and
Netflix for the most part</tt>. If we had faster connections,
we'd be pushing a fair bit higher as I'd be in a position to start
backing up more of my data offsite.<br>
<br>
So no, quotas are not really very big, they're just enough for the
average household these days. For all the flak TPG gets (and their
stupid lack of IPv6), I will give them credit for not having
shaped me in any shape way or form on their unlimited plans.<br>
<br>
- Z<br>
<br>
PS: if someone knows a provider with native IPv6 and no metering,
do tell.<br>
</tt>
</body>
</html>