<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">On 28/05/2016, at 1:34 am, Shane C <<a href="mailto:shanec-au@outlook.com" class="">shanec-au@outlook.com</a>> wrote:<br class=""></blockquote><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div class="WordSection1" style="page: WordSection1; font-family: Menlo-Regular; font-size: 10px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px;"><div style="margin: 0cm 0cm 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;" class=""><span style="font-size: 11pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;" class="">Excuse my ignorance, but what’s the “real” argument against rolling out IPv6?</span></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div>In simple terms, it seems in general to be related to:</div><div><br class=""></div><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> </span>- cost</div><div><div><span class="Apple-tab-span" style="white-space: pre;"> </span>- learning curve</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><blockquote type="cite" style="font-family: Menlo-Regular;" class="">Are those costs really higher than the cost of IPv4 and the tech/engineering being invested to avoid v6?</blockquote><br class=""></div><div class="">For some, no. For many, yes.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div></div><div>:(</div></body></html>