<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    I front-mount my switches and accept that I need to allow for a
    front-to-back cable path for my servers. In a rack with mixed
    gear-types it isn't that much of a drama because usually there's an
    available path for the purpose.  If done with decent cable
    management it also 'looks the part' - there are some quite good
    cable-management bars that have 'brushed' penetrations that allow
    you to pass cabling through to the rear of the rackspace in an
    organised and tidy fashion.<br>
    <br>
    As a datacentre operator (with cold-isle containment) nothing
    exasperates me more than seeing equipment mounted incorrectly - but
    we havn't policed this too zealously. Yet.  The bigger battle to
    fight is the one around ensuring customers fill in their blanks when
    they remove equipment!<br>
    <br>
    Mark.<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 6/11/2015 7:36 p.m., Radek Tkaczyk
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:97f2fc1ce34a44daa5c88dabc8d1f5f3@vm01.dc01.exchangevault.com.au"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
        charset=windows-1252">
      <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered
        medium)">
      <style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0cm;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman",serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
        color:windowtext;
        font-weight:normal;
        font-style:normal;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
        mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
@page WordSection1
        {size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
        margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
      <div class="WordSection1">
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Hi
            Damian,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Yep
            that was the quickest/easiest thing to do – not ideal, but
            it would keep NextDC happy at least.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Keen
            to hear how other people are solving this problem.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
            style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Regards,<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
            style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
            style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Radek
            Tkaczyk<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
            style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif">Ph:
            0413 383 231<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
              style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"
              lang="EN-US">From:</span></b><span
            style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif"
            lang="EN-US"> Damian Guppy [<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:the.damo@gmail.com">mailto:the.damo@gmail.com</a>]
            <br>
            <b>Sent:</b> Friday, 6 November 2015 4:30 PM<br>
            <b>To:</b> Radek Tkaczyk <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:radek@tkaczyk.id.au"><radek@tkaczyk.id.au></a><br>
            <b>Cc:</b> AusNOG Mailing List <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:ausnog@ausnog.net"><ausnog@ausnog.net></a><br>
            <b>Subject:</b> Re: [AusNOG] Airflow for Cisco switches in
            racks<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal">If you are mounting your 3750's on the
            rear posts they wont be deep enough to reach the front, so
            as long as you blank out the front its just going to exhaust
            air around your other equipment and the blanking plates
            should stop most of it leaking back into the cold isle. <o:p></o:p></p>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
          </div>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal">--Damian<o:p></o:p></p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
          <div>
            <p class="MsoNormal">On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Radek
              Tkaczyk <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="mailto:radek@tkaczyk.id.au" target="_blank">radek@tkaczyk.id.au</a>>
              wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
            <blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #CCCCCC
              1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm
              6.0pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm">
              <div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"
                    style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">Hi
                    Guys,<o:p></o:p></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"
                    style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"
                    style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">We
                    always mount our network switches in our racks with
                    the switches facing the rear, so that when you cable
                    up servers, you don’t have a mess of network cabling
                    going from the front of the rack to the back of the
                    rack. This has worked well for us for the last 10
                    years or so, but recently with providers like NextDC
                    doing cold isle containment, this means that
                    switches are blowing hot air into the cold aisle,
                    and some people get unhappy with this. <o:p></o:p></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"
                    style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"
                    style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">We
                    use Cisco 3750 switches which are 1RU, and they blow
                    hot air out the back of the switches, some models
                    have side-to-back airflow, but it still results in
                    hot air being sent into the cold aisle. I have
                    always thought that this amount of hot air was
                    negligible, and wouldn’t even matter in the overall
                    scheme of things, as long as your servers were
                    mounted around the right way.<o:p></o:p></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"
                    style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"
                    style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">How
                    are other people handling this situation? I’m not
                    really keen on changing our rack standards and
                    having to re-do the entire cabling for racks across
                    the 4 of our data centres that are using cold isle
                    containment!<o:p></o:p></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"
                    style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"
                    style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">Regards,<o:p></o:p></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"
                    style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"
                    style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">Radek
                    Tkaczyk<o:p></o:p></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"
                    style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto">Ph:
                    <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                      href="tel:0413%20383%20231" target="_blank">0413
                      383 231</a><o:p></o:p></p>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"
                    style="mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto"> <o:p></o:p></p>
                </div>
              </div>
              <br>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>