<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/13/2015 12:19, Damien Gardner Jnr
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAPrfDLWkf7dHZv1s9-_QD-_ZzeZV6djy-DifyCcX1RHd=BG+kQ@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra"><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 13 October 2015 at 12:16, Peter
Fern <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:ausnog@0xc0dedbad.com" target="_blank">ausnog@0xc0dedbad.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><span
class="">On 10/13/2015 12:07, Damien Gardner Jnr wrote:<br>
><br>
> It occurs to me that if folks were
latency-sensitive, it would be a<br>
> simple matter to find an overseas company who has
.au endpoints?<br>
> There are plenty around - ExpressVPN, PureVPN,
BlackVPN, Overplay,<br>
> and VPNSecure come to mind quickly.<br>
<br>
</span>But then they're subject to data retention...<br>
</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>How do you figure that? A US company (especially one
who is only providing VPN services, so is not an ISP) is
not subject to data retention..?<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Or do you mean data retention from the VPN provider's
colo provider? In that case yes, but think of the number
of sessions coming out behind that one IP address - it's
not going to be overly useful?<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
If that's all the company operates here they may indeed avoid
retention, would want to try and do some research first.<br>
</body>
</html>