<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 9/24/2015 11:53 PM, Mark Newton
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:986E357E-35DD-4BA6-BAA0-3D84C9D912F2@atdot.dotat.org"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<div><br>
On 24 Sep 2015, at 23:36, Chad Kelly <<a
moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:chad@cpkws.com.au"><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:chad@cpkws.com.au">chad@cpkws.com.au</a></a>>
wrote:</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>On 9/24/2015 11:13 PM, Mark Newton
wrote:</span><br>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>On 24 Sep 2015, at 10:54 pm, Chad
Kelly <<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:chad@cpkws.com.au">chad@cpkws.com.au</a>>
wrote:</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>CPK Web Services does not have
an IP range or a network for that matter, as I have
already stated, both publicly on social media and in our
DRIP we have written agreements in place with Micron21 who
take responsibility for the network and related stuff.</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><span>But then we have the over the
top services such as email.</span><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>So why are you even talking to
them at all? The legislation doesn’t cover you.</span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="cite"><span></span><br>
</blockquote>
<span>This is why it should be moved from the AGD to the
Department of communications, as the AGD advice varies from
what most industry people have told me.</span><br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
The AGD advice doesn't matter. The legislation does. And it seems
that you aren't talking to a lawyer about it and, perhaps, haven't
even read it yourself.
<div><br>
<blockquote type="cite"><span>Which is that providers who don't
operate their own network are not covered by this, but if
that is the case, it would leave out a number of providers
who co-locate servers in DCs that provide them with network
connectivity.</span><br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
Yes! If they're not carriers or ISPs, they are "left out."
That's what the law passed by the Parliament says.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><i>"Get a lawyer, son, hope you get a real good one."</i></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div> - mark</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
Given that the legislation has already been passed and the agencies
involved, including the AFP it is a lot easier just to give them the
information they want.<br>
They have enough flexibility within the legislation to allow time
for implementation I just personally think that the Communications
Department would be better off handling this stuff, but given the
agencies all communicate with each other they would be well aware of
the situation anyway. <br>
They do include content providers in the legislation as well. <br>
Regards Chad.<br>
<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Chad Kelly
Manager
CPK Web Services
web <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.cpkws.com.au">www.cpkws.com.au</a>
phone 03 9013 4853</pre>
</body>
</html>