<div dir="ltr"><div>I think it's pretty unfair that there's the amiguous "must do their best" in conjunction with removing the right against self incrimination. I don't know how CIOs manage a risk like that.<br><br></div>Paul Wilkins<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 22 July 2015 at 15:39, Glen Turner <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:gdt@gdt.id.au" target="_blank">gdt@gdt.id.au</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Whilst people on this list are encountering the practical implications of<br>
data retention they might wish to consider that fuller engagement with the<br>
legislative process may have lead to a better outcome.<br>
<br>
With that in mind, submissions on the "Telecommunications Sector Security<br>
Reforms" are due in about a week, on 31 July. See:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.ag.gov.au/telcosecurity" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.ag.gov.au/telcosecurity</a><br>
<br>
Recent media commentary:<br>
<br>
Richard Chirgwin, The Register<br>
"Australian carriers try to head off government telco security bill"<br>
<<a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/07/22/oz_carriers_try_to_head_off_government_telco_security_bill/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/07/22/oz_carriers_try_to_head_off_government_telco_security_bill/</a>><br>
<br>
Cheers, glen<br>
(not representing my employer, whomever that may be)<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
AusNOG mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>