<div dir="ltr"><div>I've changed my mind about IP v6, not that it's all going to need to be ripped out and replaced when they come up with a secure network layer protocol, but if there's the risk of that happening, it reduces its long term value proposition.<br><br></div>Paul Wilkins<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 2 July 2015 at 16:07, Barry Greene <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bgreene@senki.org" target="_blank">bgreene@senki.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Team,<br>
<br>
I know that all our RFPs have been “requiring IPv6." But, how detail do you get? I’ve posted some of my “cut/paste” IPv6 RPF questions here (<a href="https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ipv6-adding-requirements-your-rfp-barry-greene" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ipv6-adding-requirements-your-rfp-barry-greene</a>). What is missing? Are you getting any push back from the vendors?<br>
<br>
Barry<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
AusNOG mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>