<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 14px; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif;">
<div>
<div>All the images etc come off CDN’s so the content FB deliver is just the text based portion / html of the page.</div>
<div>They said they delivered this all over the peering locations and equinix should be preferred were their words.</div>
<div>Quite a few providers carry the backbone traffic, I know microsoft have done this now and there is at least one other about to start that I know of.</div>
<div>
<div id="">
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Considering we get around 5% across their peering in AU, if this was the case for every provider then I could assume their traffic for AU at 1.6Gbps is only 5% of the HTML and that’s just the one port they have others with other IX’s such as Equinix etc.</div>
<div>If that was the case we’re talking about 60gbps of HTML traffic they deliver to the region, seems a little high when looked at this way.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Cheers</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-- </div>
<div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri; font-size: medium;">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif;">
<span style="font-size: 11pt; color: rgb(127, 127, 127);">Kind regards,</span><span style="font-size: 11pt;"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; line-height: 12pt;">
<b><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif;">Barry Murphy</span></b><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif;"> / </span><b><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif; color: rgb(255, 158, 1);">Chief
Operating Officer</span></b><span style="font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: Helvetica, sans-serif;"><br>
</span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION">
<div style="font-family:Calibri; font-size:12pt; text-align:left; color:black; BORDER-BOTTOM: medium none; BORDER-LEFT: medium none; PADDING-BOTTOM: 0in; PADDING-LEFT: 0in; PADDING-RIGHT: 0in; BORDER-TOP: #b5c4df 1pt solid; BORDER-RIGHT: medium none; PADDING-TOP: 3pt">
<span style="font-weight:bold">From: </span>Phillip Grasso<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Date: </span>Wednesday, 6 May 2015 7:03 pm<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">To: </span>Barry Murphy<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Cc: </span>Joseph Goldman, "<a href="mailto:ausnog@lists.ausnog.net">ausnog@lists.ausnog.net</a>"<br>
<span style="font-weight:bold">Subject: </span>Re: [AusNOG] Facebook on NSW-IX<br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p dir="ltr">Sorry for stating the obvious, seems like an economically driven traffic profile. Costs a lot to carry heavy bw traffic across the pond.</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 6 May 2015 4:29 pm, "Barry Murphy" <<a href="mailto:barry@vibecommunications.co.nz">barry@vibecommunications.co.nz</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Funny enough we have a similar issue, we receive about 150mbps from their peering to us in LA and about 10mbps over their AU peering.<br>
When I ask Facebook they say all traffic should come from their AU pop however this isn’t the case.<br>
<br>
I’ve gone so far as rejecting all their more specific prefixes via transit’s and I got all outbound to them going fine via AU peering but return didn’t change.<br>
I’ve tried everything to no avail.<br>
<br>
I’ve asked their team for some debug data from their LAX routers to see what they are seeing (a looking glass would be helpful) but have asked for this for about 4 months, they keep sending sydney ‘show route’ data.<br>
<br>
Cheers<br>
<br>
--<br>
Kind regards,<br>
Barry Murphy / Chief Operating Officer<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On 5/05/15 9:22 am, "Joseph Goldman" <<a href="mailto:joe@apcs.com.au">joe@apcs.com.au</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
>Hi *,<br>
><br>
> Those who use <a href="http://IX.asn.au" target="_blank">IX.asn.au</a> NSW-IX, I see Facebook are connected up and<br>
>doing ~1.5gbit+ data @ peak. I am seeing some routes via the<br>
>route-servers, but netflow shows less than 1mbit of traffic from that<br>
>peer, which seems low for the size of my network. Does anyone know what<br>
>content exactly they serve on the IX? And if they only 'partially'<br>
>contribute to the route-servers, but need full peering for more advantage?<br>
><br>
> This is a post more out of curiosity than anything - I tried<br>
>contacting Facebook NOC & Peering teams to no response at all, so<br>
>thought I'd pose it to the list.<br>
><br>
>Thanks,<br>
>Joe<br>
>_______________________________________________<br>
>AusNOG mailing list<br>
><a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>
><a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" target="_blank">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
AusNOG mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" target="_blank">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</span>
</body>
</html>