<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html charset=us-ascii"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Which platform specifically are you talking about? I know for sure the Juniper MXs and Cisco ASR1Ks can do shaping and policing on IFLs / Sub-interfaces just fine.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">- Tim</div><br class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On 29 Apr 2015, at 7:56 pm, Paul Wilkins <<a href="mailto:paulwilkins369@gmail.com" class="">paulwilkins369@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class="">Don't do it. There are many configuration items (eg. policing/shaping) which will not work with virtual interfaces.<br class=""><br class=""></div>Paul Wilkins<br class=""></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br class=""><div class="gmail_quote">On 29 April 2015 at 09:44, James Mcintosh <span dir="ltr" class=""><<a href="mailto:james.mcintosh@rocketmail.com" target="_blank" class="">james.mcintosh@rocketmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br class=""><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=""><div style="background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); font-family: HelveticaNeue, 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; font-size: 16px;" class=""><div class="">Hi Noggers,</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Are any of you out there running "router on a stick" in your production environments?</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Traditionally this was only set up in lab/test environments but given how expensive 10Gbps+ adapters are from some vendors, and that additional adapter capability often forces you up to their next most expensive router models is there any reason not to run it in production?</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Most ISP's already run hundreds or even thousands of sub-interfaces per physical interface so is there any tangible downside to to just using a single physical interface for all the in/out connectivity to your router?</div><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888" class=""><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">-James</div><div class=""><br class=""></div></font></span></div></div><br class="">_______________________________________________<br class="">
AusNOG mailing list<br class="">
<a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net" class="">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br class="">
<a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" target="_blank" class="">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><br class="">
<br class=""></blockquote></div><br class=""></div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">AusNOG mailing list<br class=""><a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net" class="">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br class="">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog<br class=""></div></blockquote></div><br class=""></body></html>