<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /></head><body style='font-size: 10pt'>
<p>On 31/03/2015 01:07, Scott Howard wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:37 AM, Noel Butler <span><<a href="mailto:noel.butler@ausics.net">noel.butler@ausics.net</a>></span> wrote:<br />
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0 0 0 .8ex; border-left: 1px #ccc solid; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div style="font-size: 10pt;">
<p><span style="font-size: 10pt;">The indepth details </span><a style="font-size: 10pt;" href="http://bit.ly/1HWhSDq">http://bit.ly/1HWhSDq</a></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>So 6 out of 63 SITES worked with IPv6.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>2 of those 6 sites combined (given you've treated Google and Youtube as separate sites) account for around 25-40% of internet traffic (depending on which numbers you believe). So given that you started out talking about traffic rather than sites your real number is closer to 30-45% of traffic.</div>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
<div>I visit youtube at least once every 2 days or so, doesnt mean to say any my subs have new posts, so I may not stay longer than a few seconds - I dont take any notice on whats recommended for me, so my numbers are far far far from your estimates, much more closer to mine, in fact well less than 8%.</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div dir="ltr"> </div>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div>Your testing is confused as it's not clear if you're trying to test the number of sites (as per your conclusion) or the volume of traffic (as per your introduction). If you're</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div> </div>
<div>Well, the number of sites reachable is just as important, in fact, no, it's more important.</div>
<div>Because then to prove your IPv6 is such a huge traffic success all you need do is live on youtube - but thats hardly a true picture of the state of IPv6 usability, is it.</div>
<div> </div>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0">
<div>trying to prove that we're not ready for IPv6-only clients, then congratulations you've succeeded. If you're trying to show that IPv6 can't help to (for example) lessen the volume of traffic that would need to be handled by CGNAT infrastructure in a dual-stack environment, you've failure.</div>
</blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>I have proved that I set out to do. I hardly expect teh IPv6 fanbois to be overly happy with my results, I expected a large number of flames from them :)</div>
<div> </div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body></html>