<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    I was refering to stuff like this:<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://isc.sans.edu/forums/diary/New+tricks+that+may+bring+DNS+spoofing+back+or+Why+you+should+enable+DNSSEC+even+if+it+is+a+pain+to+do/16859/">https://isc.sans.edu/forums/diary/New+tricks+that+may+bring+DNS+spoofing+back+or+Why+you+should+enable+DNSSEC+even+if+it+is+a+pain+to+do/16859/</a><br>
    <br>
    It would only be a security issue in certain cases, but if the set
    of ports was consecutive and not pseudo randomised it could reduce
    security of some applications which utilise random source ports.<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 26/03/15 11:31, Sid wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:EBEA95BF-E44F-41CB-A17E-28E0D69A094D@gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      <div>Hi Nick,</div>
      <div><br>
        On 26 Mar 2015, at 03:28, Nick Stallman <<a
          moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:nick@agentpoint.com">nick@agentpoint.com</a>>
        wrote:<br>
        <br>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite">
        <div><span>What security concerns would there be to reducing the
            source ports from 65535 to 100?</span><br>
          <span>They are usually kept pretty random for a reason aren't
            they?</span><br>
        </div>
      </blockquote>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      I guess it depends on what you want out of CGNAT. As the RFC
      linked by Scott says, you don't get better or worse security over
      a non CGNAT setup with algorithmic NAT allocation.
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>(That RFC again: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
          href="https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7422.txt">https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7422.txt</a> )</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>I've never setup a CGNAT. But if it was for internet end
        users as an ISP, I can't see it being implemented for security
        reasons - only as a resource preservation mechanism. "Security"
        would just be a byproduct.</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>If you are setting up any NAT solution specifically for some
        level of "security", then that changes things.</div>
      <div><br>
      </div>
      <div>Sid</div>
      <div>
        <blockquote type="cite">
          <div><span></span></div>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
      Nick Stallman<br>
      Agentpoint Pty Ltd <br>
      The Real Estate Web Developers<br>
      Melbourne | Sydney | Miami<br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:nick@agentpoint.com">nick@agentpoint.com</a><br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.agentpoint.com.au">www.agentpoint.com.au</a> | <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.zooproperty.com">www.zooproperty.com</a> | <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.ginga.com.au">www.ginga.com.au</a> |
      <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.business2.com.au">www.business2.com.au</a><br>
      <br>
      Business2.com.au is a real estate agent information website that
      helps you understand Portals, Technology and comes with FREE tools
      to help your Agency become an online success!</div>
  </body>
</html>