
<html>

  <head>

    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"

      http-equiv="Content-Type">

  </head>

  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">

    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 17/03/2015 4:25 pm, Robert Hudson

      wrote:<br>

    </div>

    <blockquote

cite="mid:CAOu9xNJYBRyR1W1ai2msjLO2vuPMX8qJSBK1mVthDfbLXYrRkg@mail.gmail.com"

      type="cite">

      <div dir="ltr">

        <div class="gmail_extra"><br>

          <div class="gmail_quote">On 17 March 2015 at 16:20, Nick

            Stallman <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"

                href="mailto:nick@agentpoint.com" target="_blank">nick@agentpoint.com</a>></span>

            wrote:<br>

            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0

              .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

              <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> I'm hoping they are

                stupid enough to make the censorship mechanism DNS based

                or similar.<br>

                Easiest for them to handle (fewer false positives) and

                oh so easy to bypass.<br>

              </div>

            </blockquote>

            <div><br>

            </div>

            <div>I'd much rather see them not introduce or pass stupid

              laws to start with.  Unfortunately, the former seems to be

              the form that the current government is in, thankfully so

              far they haven't been so successful at the latter.</div>

            <br>

          </div>

        </div>

      </div>

    </blockquote>

    "Current government"? If you think the opposition are any different

    I don't know why.<br>

    <br>

    It is looking like the opposition are going to waive data retention

    through without even the amendments they were patting themselves on

    the back for (warrants for journos data). There is no reason to

    think this will be significantly different.<br>

  </body>

</html>