<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Not sure this sort of response is
      helpful in the long run Rod. The facts are that the Government has
      done this deal as part of the US/AUS Free trade agreement. No
      amount of wishing it away will make it not so.  Even though I
      might agree that it's not our problem and it's expense we cant
      afford. The deal is done. The horse has bolted. <br>
      <br>
      All we can do now is try and make suggestions to make it easier
      for us to manage the process. But this like the meta data
      retention will happen. It's already been agreed to. We just need
      to come to terms with that and move on. <br>
      <br>
      Matt.<br>
      <br>
      <br>
      <br>
      <br>
      <br>
      <br>
      On 23/02/2015 10:56 am, Rod Veith wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:018c01d04efb$20470ef0$60d52cd0$@rb.net.au"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
        charset=windows-1252">
      <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered
        medium)">
      <!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]-->
      <style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:Cambria;
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Tahoma;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Consolas;
        panose-1:2 11 6 9 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0cm;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
        color:black;}
h3
        {mso-style-priority:9;
        mso-style-link:"Heading 3 Char";
        mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
        margin-right:0cm;
        mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
        margin-left:0cm;
        font-size:13.5pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
        color:black;
        font-weight:bold;}
h4
        {mso-style-priority:9;
        mso-style-link:"Heading 4 Char";
        mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
        margin-right:0cm;
        mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
        margin-left:0cm;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
        color:black;
        font-weight:bold;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
p
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
        margin-right:0cm;
        mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
        margin-left:0cm;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
        color:black;}
pre
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted Char";
        margin:0cm;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:10.0pt;
        font-family:"Courier New";
        color:black;}
p.MsoAcetate, li.MsoAcetate, div.MsoAcetate
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-style-link:"Balloon Text Char";
        margin:0cm;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:8.0pt;
        font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
        color:black;}
span.Heading3Char
        {mso-style-name:"Heading 3 Char";
        mso-style-priority:9;
        mso-style-link:"Heading 3";
        font-family:"Cambria","serif";
        color:#4F81BD;
        font-weight:bold;}
span.Heading4Char
        {mso-style-name:"Heading 4 Char";
        mso-style-priority:9;
        mso-style-link:"Heading 4";
        font-family:"Cambria","serif";
        color:#4F81BD;
        font-weight:bold;
        font-style:italic;}
span.HTMLPreformattedChar
        {mso-style-name:"HTML Preformatted Char";
        mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-style-link:"HTML Preformatted";
        font-family:Consolas;
        color:black;}
span.EmailStyle22
        {mso-style-type:personal;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:#1F497D;}
span.BalloonTextChar
        {mso-style-name:"Balloon Text Char";
        mso-style-priority:99;
        mso-style-link:"Balloon Text";
        font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";
        color:black;}
span.EmailStyle26
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
        {size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
        margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
      <div class="WordSection1">
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">My
            2 page response has been sent to the Comms Alliance. I find
            abhorrent the whole premise that ISPs have a role to play in
            copyright enforcement prior to the issuing of court orders!<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Willing
            to share and hope to swap responses off list.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Summary
            of response: Totally against the scheme.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Rod<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <div>
          <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF
            1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
            <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext"
                  lang="EN-US">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext"
                lang="EN-US"> AusNOG
                [<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:ausnog-bounces@lists.ausnog.net">mailto:ausnog-bounces@lists.ausnog.net</a>] <b>On Behalf
                  Of </b>Rod Veith<br>
                <b>Sent:</b> Monday, 23 February 2015 8:50 AM<br>
                <b>To:</b> 'Paul Brooks'; <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ausnog@lists.ausnog.net">ausnog@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>
                <b>Subject:</b> Re: [AusNOG] "ISPs agree to graduated
                warnings for pirates"<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Thank
            you for the links.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">We
            are preparing our reply and will send it to the alliance.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Our
            ISP business has not been approached about this scheme
            either before or after this draft was produced by the
            Communications Alliance.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Rod
            <o:p></o:p></span></p>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
        <div>
          <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF
            1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
            <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext"
                  lang="EN-US">From:</span></b><span
style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext"
                lang="EN-US"> AusNOG [<a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:ausnog-bounces@lists.ausnog.net">mailto:ausnog-bounces@lists.ausnog.net</a>]
                <b>On Behalf Of </b>Paul Brooks<br>
                <b>Sent:</b> Monday, 23 February 2015 8:14 AM<br>
                <b>To:</b> <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="mailto:ausnog@lists.ausnog.net">ausnog@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>
                <b>Subject:</b> Re: [AusNOG] "ISPs agree to graduated
                warnings for pirates"<o:p></o:p></span></p>
          </div>
        </div>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
        <div>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">Noel -
            assume there isn't anyone from CommsAlliance here to address
            the concerns - reps from the comms industry on this working
            group were Baker and McKenzie, Telstra, Optus, M2, iiNet,
            IPStar, Verizon and VHA.<br>
            Many of these concerns were probably raised during the
            working committee meetings that brought this about - but
            many of them would have been howled down by the content
            industry.<br>
            The group that put this together had a deadline to put out a
            draft code that both sides could at least live with - if
            they don't meet the deadline with a draft that the service
            providers AND the content industry can live with, then the
            Government was going to 'create' one themselves and impose
            it whether you liked it or not - and most people figured
            that would be worse. They still might.<br>
            <br>
            I agree, these are all really good comments. Now everyone
            needs to get them in to Comms Alliance before the end of the
            public coment period. Commenting in here is like a
            discussion at the urinal in the pub - satisfying, but
            doesn't get the vibe in to the people that are making the
            decisions.<br>
            <br>
            This thing is now in a legislated process, in accordance
            with the Telco Act:<br>
            * 1 month public comment period to Comms Alliance<br>
            * Comms Alliance committee consider all the public comments
            and make changes as determined by the working committee<br>
            * if the changes agreed by the committee are big enough
            there might need to be another public comment period - or
            they might just reach out to people the comment to run them
            through the changes<br>
            * Comms Alliance presents the draft code to ACMA<br>
            * ACMA open up a 2 month (might be 1 month) public comment
            period<br>
            * ACMA consider comments and suggestions made to ACMA<br>
            * ACMA make it a mandatory code applicable to every carriage
            service provider<br>
            <br>
            Even if its 'I don't agree with this, and I'm not a member
            of Comms Alliance, and Comms Alliance shouldn't be claiming
            to represent the industry when it only represents its
            members and didn't ask AusNOG', write your comment in to
            Comms Alliance.<br>
            Even better, suggest specific changes to words and
            processes. These are required to be addressed by the
            committee, to a level that a comment like 'this is screwed
            up I don't agree' won't be.<br>
            <br>
            So please please please - everyone,  on behalf of your
            service provider of employment, or as an interested
            individual, follow the public comment instructions at <a
              moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="http://www.commsalliance.com.au/Documents/public-comment">http://www.commsalliance.com.au/Documents/public-comment</a>
            and let the Committee know what changes you would like to
            see in and out of this draft code:<o:p></o:p></p>
          <h4>Want to submit a comment on a draft document?<o:p></o:p></h4>
          <p>You can use the <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.commsalliance.com.au/Documents/public-comment/submit-comments">Submit
              Comments form</a> to submit your comments via email or go
            to the <a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="http://www.commsalliance.com.au/contact_us"
              target="_blank">Contact Us</a> webpage to obtain other
            contact methods such as by post or fax.<o:p></o:p></p>
          <p class="MsoNormal">All submissions received will be made
            publically available on the Communications Alliance website
            unless the submitter requests otherwise.<o:p></o:p></p>
          <blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
            <h3>Copyright Notice Scheme Industry Code<o:p></o:p></h3>
            <p><a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.commsalliance.com.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/47570/DR-C653-2015.pdf">DR
                C653:2015 (709 KB)</a><o:p></o:p></p>
            <p>The Copyright Notice Scheme Industry Code creates a
              Copyright Notice Scheme through which residential fixed
              internet users who are alleged to have infringed copyright
              online will receive an escalating series of infringement
              notices designed to change their behaviour and steer them
              toward lawful sources of content. The Scheme has a strong
              emphasis on public education and does not contain explicit
              sanctions against internet users, but does provide for a
              ‘facilitated preliminary discovery’ process through which
              ISPs can assist Rights Holders who may decide to take
              legal action against persistent infringers.<o:p></o:p></p>
            <p>Information on the Working Committee which revised the
              Code, including the Terms of Reference can be found <a
                moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.commsalliance.com.au/Activities/committees-and-groups/wc66">here.</a><o:p></o:p></p>
            <p><strong>PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD CLOSES AT 5.00 P.M. ON (<a
                  moz-do-not-send="true"
                  href="http://australia.gov.au/about-australia/our-country/time">AEDT</a>)
                23 March 2015.</strong><o:p></o:p></p>
            <p>Please note that all submissions received will be made
              publically available on the Communications Alliance
              website unless the submitter requests otherwise.<o:p></o:p></p>
            <div class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:center"
              align="center">
              <hr align="center" size="3" width="100%"></div>
          </blockquote>
          <p class="MsoNormal"><br>
            Even if you just cut'n'paste the comments made in here in
            the past day.<br>
            <br>
            All comments are required to be considered by the committee,
            and the more people that provide comments, the more they
            know the level of feeling behind it.<br>
            <br>
            <br>
            Paul.<br>
            <br>
            <br>
            <br>
            <br>
            <br>
            <br>
            <br>
            On 22/02/2015 2:20 PM, Noel Butler wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
        </div>
        <blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
          <p>Absolutely agree, their intention might be well meaning,
            but there is too many holes in it, perhaps someone from
            comms alliance here would like to address these concerns?<o:p></o:p></p>
          <p>On 22/02/2015 12:37, Damien Gardner Jnr wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
          <blockquote style="border:none;border-left:solid #1010FF
            1.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm
            4.0pt;margin-left:3.75pt;margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt">
            <div>
              <p class="MsoNormal">It did seem a little one-sided
                there.  It's all well and fine to say the process on the
                Rights Holder side must be certified, but there was no
                documented recourse if it should be found that the
                Rights Holder was telling furfies.  For example, AFAIAC,
                should the Rights Holder be found to be making false
                allegations, the ISP should have the right to blacklist
                them and never deal with them again. <o:p></o:p></p>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
              </div>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal">Seems like the Account Holder needs
                  some recourse BEFORE the Final Notice, also.  For
                  example, if the Account Holder is a household with 4
                  teenagers, AND lots of visiting friends, well, they
                  have no way to tell who may have done it, so there
                  needs to be a way to come back to the ISP and say
                  'Sorry, this was NOT me, nor was it someone I can
                  identify, so please cancel this notice'.<o:p></o:p></p>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal">I don't like the requirement for
                    the ISP to send out the Final Notices via registered
                    post, without there being some way to recoup that
                    cost.  Automated emails are all well and fine.  But
                    once you have to have someone print, fold, and stuff
                    a letter, walk to the post office, get a tracking
                    number, and then come back and enter that number
                    into a system, that notice just cost you $30 to
                    send.  And then later when someone needs to audit
                    that process because there was a failure in the
                    system (The accounts junior that walked to the post
                    office mixed up two of the tracking numbers), that
                    notice then just cost you another $200+ in developer
                    time.<o:p></o:p></p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
                </div>
                <div>
                  <p class="MsoNormal">Seems to be putting a LOT of cost
                    and administrative overhead on the ISP's, for NO
                    benefit to ISP's or the community.  All the benefit
                    is on the Rights Holders.  Perhaps a $10-20 per
                    processed infringement notice incoming from the
                    Rights Holders would be a good cost offset for the
                    effort involved?<o:p></o:p></p>
                </div>
              </div>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
              </div>
              <div>
                <p class="MsoNormal"> <o:p></o:p></p>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
          <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><br>
            <br>
            <o:p></o:p></p>
          <pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre>
          <pre>AusNOG mailing list<o:p></o:p></pre>
          <pre><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
          <pre><a moz-do-not-send="true" href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><o:p></o:p></pre>
        </blockquote>
        <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
/* Matt Perkins 
        Direct 1300 137 379     Spectrum Networks Ptd. Ltd. 
        Office 1300 133 299     <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:matt@spectrum.com.au">matt@spectrum.com.au</a> 
                                Level 6, 350 George Street Sydney 2000
        PGP/GNUPG Public Key can be found at  <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://pgp.mit.edu">http://pgp.mit.edu</a> 
*/
</pre>
  </body>
</html>