<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<b style=""><span style="font-size: 8pt; line-height: 115%;
font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; color:
gray;"></span></b> This assumes there's sufficient capacity to
their access network. Congestion at the border probably is the least
of problems, despite being the most visible on the PIPE IX graphs.
Contention has to happen somewhere, right? <br>
<br>
-Brad<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 22/10/2014 10:15 AM, Luke Iggleden
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:5446E924.5030100@sisgroup.com.au" type="cite">Sorry
but I don't agree with this. The idea is to get good performance
to eyeballs. Finger pointing gets us nowhere fast. End users are
likely to be in contract with TPG and can't walk anyway.
<br>
<br>
Jared is doing what any other good provider would, contact the
network that is congested, advise and see if they can work a deal
for a better path or fix the congestion.
<br>
<br>
Why wouldn't TPG add a couple of extra 10G ports to their peering
network considering their cost is $0.
<br>
<br>
<br>
On 22/10/2014 8:58 am, John Lindsay wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">So make it clear where the problem is and
the end users can make their
<br>
choice of provider.
<br>
<br>
John Lindsay
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
_______________________________________________
<br>
AusNOG mailing list
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>