<div dir="ltr">$200/Mbps isn't the real figure.<div><br></div><div>From the post: <span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">"We don't disclose exactly what we pay for transit, but I can give you a relative sense of regional differences. To start, let's assume as a benchmark in North America you'd pay a blended average across all the transit providers of $10/Mbps. </span><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">In reality, we pay less than that, but it can serve as a benchmark, and keep the numbers round as we compare regions. If you assume that benchmark, for every 1,000Mbps (1Gbps) you'd pay $10,000/month (again, acknowledge that’s higher than reality, it’s just an illustrative benchmark and keeps the numbers round, bear with me)."</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">So he's just using $10 as a starting for North America and saying whatever the actual figure is it's 20x that here.<br>
</span></div><div><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">In reality It's probably a difference of $1/Mbps to $20/Mbps.</span></div>
<div><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><br></span></div><div><span style="font-family:arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">It's a 1:20 ratio is his point</span></div></div><div class="gmail_extra">
<br clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr"><div>Regards,</div><div>Ben Grubb</div></div></div>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 27 August 2014 00:36, Cameron Ferdinands <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:cameron@jferdinands.com" target="_blank">cameron@jferdinands.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
What about PIPE IX? and PPC-1? A few years ago? PIPE was founded in<br>
2001. Joe's been doing a fantastic job at WAIA too.<br>
<br>
There's still several networks in AUS that don't peer either or only<br>
present at a single location. (not GoF), including some big big<br>
content providers.<br>
<br>
$200mbit ? Hardly, those numbers were clearly pulled out of somewhere.<br>
I also highly doubt they don't participate in paid peering agreements<br>
in other regions too. This article is junk.<br>
<br>
On 27 August 2014 00:15, Wolfgang Nagele (AusRegistry)<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><<a href="mailto:wolfgang.nagele@ausregistry.com.au">wolfgang.nagele@ausregistry.com.au</a>> wrote:<br>
> Australia is making huge strides towards better interconnection. A few years<br>
> ago there was almost no Internet Exchange capacity in use but rather<br>
> capacity was bought via transit. Nowadays you have Megaport and WAIA present<br>
> in most states and there is a lot of content exchanged via these platforms.<br>
><br>
> Fixing Telstra by regulation is a whole different story ...<br>
><br>
> On 8/27/14, 12:08 AM, "Ben Grubb" <<a href="mailto:bgrubb@fairfaxmedia.com.au">bgrubb@fairfaxmedia.com.au</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Sure but there's hardly been any discussion of late on this and the impact<br>
> it has on the Australian market.<br>
><br>
> Net neutrality has barely rated a mention in Australia since 2008. Combine<br>
> it with NBN Co's CVC charge and it's not looking like Australia will become<br>
> attractive for content players at all. Do we want that?<br>
><br>
> Regards,<br>
> Ben Grubb<br>
><br>
><br>
> On 27 August 2014 00:06, Wolfgang Nagele (AusRegistry)<br>
> <<a href="mailto:wolfgang.nagele@ausregistry.com.au">wolfgang.nagele@ausregistry.com.au</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Just look into Netflix + <insert large eyeball network name here> in the<br>
>> US. It’s not an Australian thing. It’s been the “war” between eyeball<br>
>> networks and content for a while.<br>
>><br>
>> On 8/27/14, 12:04 AM, "Ben Grubb" <<a href="mailto:bgrubb@fairfaxmedia.com.au">bgrubb@fairfaxmedia.com.au</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> Sure. Doesn't make it right though.<br>
>><br>
>> When talking about the Australian market though are there others besides<br>
>> Telstra using similar tactics?<br>
>><br>
>> Regards,<br>
>> Ben Grubb<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On 27 August 2014 00:02, Wolfgang Nagele (AusRegistry)<br>
>> <<a href="mailto:wolfgang.nagele@ausregistry.com.au">wolfgang.nagele@ausregistry.com.au</a>> wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> Simply not true that Telstra is the only one doing this. Deutsche Telekom<br>
>>> has been known to use the same practice for now decades. Swisscom, same<br>
>>> thing.<br>
>>><br>
>>> All of the Gorillas are doing this. Sadly.<br>
>>><br>
>>> On 8/26/14, 11:35 PM, "Ben Grubb" <<a href="mailto:bgrubb@fairfaxmedia.com.au">bgrubb@fairfaxmedia.com.au</a>> wrote:<br>
>>><br>
>>> I'm planning on writing about this guys for the SMH. Matt at CloudFlare<br>
>>> gave me the heads up earlier.<br>
>>><br>
>>> If anyone feels like ranting to me about this, drop me a line :)<br>
>>><br>
>>> It's really interesting IMO, especially considering it's in Telstra's<br>
>>> best interest with its 50% stake in Foxtel to keep content players like<br>
>>> Netflix away. Only way to do that is by charging them ridiculous transit<br>
>>> fees.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Regards,<br>
>>> Ben Grubb<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> On 26 August 2014 23:30, James Andrewartha <<a href="mailto:trs80@ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au">trs80@ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au</a>><br>
>>> wrote:<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> <a href="http://blog.cloudflare.com/the-relative-cost-of-bandwidth-around-the-world" target="_blank">http://blog.cloudflare.com/the-relative-cost-of-bandwidth-around-the-world</a><br>
>>>> via <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8226654" target="_blank">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8226654</a><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> "Australia is the most expensive region in which we operate, but for an<br>
>>>> interesting reason. We peer with virtually every ISP in the region<br>
>>>> except<br>
>>>> one: Telstra. Telstra, which controls approximately 50% of the market,<br>
>>>> and<br>
>>>> was traditionally the monopoly telecom provider, charges some of the<br>
>>>> highest transit pricing in the world — 20x the benchmark ($200/Mbps)."<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Not quite news, but it's still interesting to see the relative numbers.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> --<br>
>>>> # TRS-80 trs80(a)<a href="http://ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au" target="_blank">ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au</a> #/ "Otherwise Bub here<br>
>>>> will do \<br>
>>>> # UCC Wheel Member <a href="http://trs80.ucc.asn.au/" target="_blank">http://trs80.ucc.asn.au/</a> #| what squirrels do<br>
>>>> best |<br>
>>>> [ "There's nobody getting rich writing ]| -- Collect and hide<br>
>>>> your |<br>
>>>> [ software that I know of" -- Bill Gates, 1980 ]\ nuts." -- Acid<br>
>>>> Reflux #231 /<br>
>>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>>> AusNOG mailing list<br>
>>>> <a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>
>>>> <a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" target="_blank">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><br>
>>>><br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>> The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying<br>
>>> files is or may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any<br>
>>> use, dissemination, reliance, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail<br>
>>> or any attached files is unauthorised. This e-mail is subject to copyright.<br>
>>> No part of it should be reproduced, adapted or communicated without the<br>
>>> written consent of the copyright owner. If you have received this e-mail in<br>
>>> error please advise the sender immediately by return e-mail or telephone and<br>
>>> delete all copies. Fairfax Media does not guarantee the accuracy or<br>
>>> completeness of any information contained in this e-mail or attached files.<br>
>>> Internet communications are not secure, therefore Fairfax Media does not<br>
>>> accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message or attached<br>
>>> files.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying<br>
>> files is or may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any<br>
>> use, dissemination, reliance, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail<br>
>> or any attached files is unauthorised. This e-mail is subject to copyright.<br>
>> No part of it should be reproduced, adapted or communicated without the<br>
>> written consent of the copyright owner. If you have received this e-mail in<br>
>> error please advise the sender immediately by return e-mail or telephone and<br>
>> delete all copies. Fairfax Media does not guarantee the accuracy or<br>
>> completeness of any information contained in this e-mail or attached files.<br>
>> Internet communications are not secure, therefore Fairfax Media does not<br>
>> accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message or attached<br>
>> files.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying files<br>
> is or may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any use,<br>
> dissemination, reliance, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail or<br>
> any attached files is unauthorised. This e-mail is subject to copyright. No<br>
> part of it should be reproduced, adapted or communicated without the written<br>
> consent of the copyright owner. If you have received this e-mail in error<br>
> please advise the sender immediately by return e-mail or telephone and<br>
> delete all copies. Fairfax Media does not guarantee the accuracy or<br>
> completeness of any information contained in this e-mail or attached files.<br>
> Internet communications are not secure, therefore Fairfax Media does not<br>
> accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message or attached<br>
> files.<br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> AusNOG mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" target="_blank">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><br>
><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
<br>
<span style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial,sans-serif;background-color:rgb(255,255,255)"><font size="1">The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying files is or may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, dissemination, reliance, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail or any attached files is unauthorised. This e-mail is subject to copyright. No part of it should be reproduced, adapted or communicated without the written consent of the copyright owner. If you have received this e-mail in error please advise the sender immediately by return e-mail or telephone and delete all copies. Fairfax Media does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this e-mail or attached files. Internet communications are not secure, therefore Fairfax Media does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message or attached files.</font></span>