<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On 23 July 2014 20:57, Mark ZZZ Smith <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:markzzzsmith@yahoo.com.au" target="_blank">markzzzsmith@yahoo.com.au</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=""><br></div>I still think it is significant that around half of all Internet connections in Australia are wireless.</blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>The only thing surprising about that is that the figure you've quoted isn't higher. That said, I find that particular statistic to be pretty useless - and here's why.</div><div><br></div><div>
In my household, I have three wireless broadband connections (two mobile phones with data plans, plus a pre-paid 4G WiFi AP) and a single wired connection. And I don't have children who have their own mobile phones or devices - that number could easily climb to six or more wireless connections without any significant effort - and that's without having extended family in the house - and it's becoming more and more common to have more than two generations in a household.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Wireless is brilliant for certain things. Consuming large amounts of data is not one of those things (at least not in this market, I acknowledge that the bottleneck in Australia isn't the capability of the technology).<br>
</div><div><br></div><div>The consumption of content over wireless in this country is still very small. It's possible to get a ridiculously large quota (I get 150GB a month if memory serves, I honestly don't even think about quota on my ADSL service any more, but I know I'm WAY below the maximum quota available on basic consumer ADSL services) on wired for less than I pay for 1.5GB a month on Telsta 4G (on which I can't even download a single DVD ISO without paying stupidly obscene excess data charges - assuming it works at all when I'm on the move, given even the best 4G network in the country still has black spots and massive congestion issues at times).</div>
<div><br></div><div><div>Back to my first line - what is more interesting than the number of raw wired and wireless connections is the volume of data consumed on wired vs wireless connections - wireless connections have been relatively static for years in terms of how much data is downloaded per month (and have actually gone backwards slightly over the last two years), whereas the amount of data consumed by wired connections seems to double every couple of years (if even that long) - and I bet if you found information on the data produced from wireless and wired connections, it'd be even more glaringly obviously biased in favour of wired).</div>
</div><div><br></div></div></div></div>