<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10-07-14 07:56, Pieter Hulshoff
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:53BE2B19.7040307@aimvalley.nl" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10-07-14 02:04, Lincoln Dale
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAAhBB_CftjxTXGfKG2bWRTJfvgbuBkqZPa9yaOfqOnvoz=RrPA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 7:07 AM,
Pieter Hulshoff <span dir="ltr"><<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:phulshof@aimvalley.nl" target="_blank">phulshof@aimvalley.nl</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="">On 09-07-14 22:47, Alexander Neilson
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
.8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> I
may be wrong in this however when I have seen this
question before I was told that the power needs for
pushing 10Gbps over copper cables was greater than
what was available over SFP+<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
I've seen similar discussions. From what I could find,
phys are quickly coming down in power towards the 1.5W
it needs to be for an SFP+, so this might become viable
in the not too distant future.<br>
</blockquote>
<div> <br>
</div>
<div>Alas, no, you won't just yet. The next-generation
10GBASE-T PHYs at 28nm are still not within 1.5W power
envelope of SFP+, nor is the die size necessary for them
something that fits inside a SFP+.</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
You may very well be right; I'll have to do some investigating to
see if there's none on any of the roadmaps either.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I ran into this press release from 2013:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://linleygroup.com/newsletters/newsletter_detail.php?num=5089&year=2013&tag=1">http://linleygroup.com/newsletters/newsletter_detail.php?num=5089&year=2013&tag=1</a>
: 19 mm^2, and 1.5W for loops < 10m. It seems like it's getting
there.<br>
<br>
Kind regards,<br>
<br>
Pieter Hulshoff<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>