<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><br>
We certainly do have over regulation here in Oz. In QLD, you
must be a qualified & licenced Sparkie to change your electric
Jug/kettle element. Yup, that's right, typically 2 x 3/16 brass
nuts near the lid of a electric kettle/jug, 3 mins and its done!<br>
<br>
As a a few years ago, the QLD "professional" body representing
Sparkies insisted this be enforced so as to give them status.
Well, in my mind, the status is equal to my Mum who for years
changed them on her own. <br>
<br>
Mal<br>
<div class="moz-signature">
<p> </p>
<center> <font size="3" color="#CC0000" face="Arial"> <br>
</font> </center>
</div>
On 3/02/2014 5:23 PM, Mark Newton wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:3EBE1DE1-AD0D-441A-93BE-F707318E79F0@atdot.dotat.org"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
On Feb 3, 2014, at 1:14 PM, Glen Turner <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:gdt@gdt.id.au"><gdt@gdt.id.au></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Paul Jones wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">The whole idea of the licence requirement starts to break down when your comms service is delivered via fibre, as there is nothing electrically you could do anyway to break it.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
The risks don’t go away, they change. For example, control of sharps.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
And Australians have never met a risk they won’t unsuccessfully try to regulate away.
The countercase is the USA, which does an order of magnitude more cabling work than we do (data and electrical) with no government licensing, cheaper, and with clearly acceptable safety and network integrity outcomes. Want to wire your own house? Go your hardest.
So it seems to me that there exists proof by demonstration that the licensing scheme in Australia is probably unnecessary, unless we’re somehow inferior to Americans, or our Australian linesmen are uniquely susceptible to electrocution.
The scheme started during telco (re/de)regulation, when Telecom wanted obstacles in the way of Joe Bloggs touching phone wiring without the benefit of the magical golden gloves the line techs were using, and non-tariff trade barriers in the way of people importing cheap telephones before they’d finished writing-off the development costs on their touchphones. It basically preserved the “Telecom Approved” labeling system that had kept competitors out of the industry for years previously.
Anyone who bought a modem in the 1980’s or 1990’s by mail order from the USA knew precisely how much Australians were paying for the Austel Tax when they compared the price against the identical article with the Austel tick for sale in the shops.
These days having a license just means that you constrain your actions for fear of losing your license. I’ve never held one, so I’ve never had any compunction about doing whatever cabling I've needed to do. It’s liberating, try it some time :-)
- mark
_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>