<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>I hope TPG don't need access to any more buildings for the FTTB builds. <br><br><div>John Lindsay</div></div><div><br>On 14 Jan 2014, at 2:28 pm, David Bomba <<a href="mailto:turbo124@gmail.com">turbo124@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div>TPG have already succeeded in gaining access to locations using this part of the act.<br><br></div>TPG v Megaport is merely commercial activism to disrupt a competitors activities. <br></div></div>
<div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 14 January 2014 14:23, John Lindsay <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:johnslindsay@mac.com" target="_blank">johnslindsay@mac.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Imagine how good it will be for TPG's FTTB strategy if they win this?<br>
<br>
Every building owner in Australia will say "sod off" when they try to gain access.<br>
<br>
You win and you lose.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
John Lindsay<br>
</font></span><div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
> On 14 Jan 2014, at 2:18 pm, Luke Iggleden <<a href="mailto:luke%2Bausnog@sisgroup.com.au">luke+ausnog@sisgroup.com.au</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> My point was its a carrier to carrier dispute, I would have thought the TIO would be powerless for this. Time will tell.<br>
><br>
> What's more interesting is what will pan out as a result of this and possibly set a precedent. Are co-located clients, who lease a space from a datacenter "occupiers" or not.<br>
><br>
> By my definition of occupied they would be, but who knows, I'm not from legal counsel. Has this been tested in the past? @bev?<br>
><br>
><br>
>> On 14/01/2014 2:11 pm, Patrick Cole wrote:<br>
>> Luke,<br>
>><br>
>> <a href="http://www.tio.com.au/about-us/policies-and-procedures/objections-to-land-access-activity" target="_blank">http://www.tio.com.au/about-us/policies-and-procedures/objections-to-land-access-activity</a><br>
>><br>
>> The TIO seems to be the place to go with objections to land access notices<br>
>> that cannot be resolved by other means.<br>
>><br>
>> Pat<br>
>><br>
>> Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 01:07:15PM +1100, Luke Iggleden wrote:<br>
>><br>
>>> Not sure what the TIO will do with this.<br>
>>><br>
>>> Numerous items listed in their constitution seem to exclude them from<br>
>>> looking into this:<br>
>>><br>
>>> 4.3 The functions of the TIO do not extend to complaints relating to:<br>
>>><br>
>>> (i)<br>
>>> matters which may involve anti competitive behaviour or restrictive<br>
>>> practices potentially in breach of the Trade Practices Act 1974;<br>
>>> (j)<br>
>>> matters which are specifically under consideration by the Australian<br>
>>> Communications and Media Authority, the Australian Competition and<br>
>>> Consumer Commission or any court or tribunal, or which have been<br>
>>> considered by any of those bodies previously;<br>
>>> (k)<br>
>>> the content of a content service (as defined in The Telecommunications<br>
>>> Act 1997); and<br>
>>> (l)<br>
>>> an alleged breach of an industry code or industry standard by a member<br>
>>> of the Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman Limited, where the<br>
>>> complaint is made by a member of the Telecommunications Industry<br>
>>> Ombudsman Limited or another industry participant<br>
>>><br>
>>> Doesn't handle inter-member disputes, doubt megaport is obliged to be a<br>
>>> member of the TIO which may exclude them in l.<br>
>>><br>
>>><br>
>>>> On 14/01/2014 12:40 pm, Bevan Slattery wrote:<br>
>>>> Hi All,<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> As the subject line says?<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> <a href="http://www.megaport.com/blog/entry/megaport-temporarily-suspends-new-megaport-orders-from-pipe-networks-datacentres-1.html" target="_blank">http://www.megaport.com/blog/entry/megaport-temporarily-suspends-new-megaport-orders-from-pipe-networks-datacentres-1.html</a><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Email Friendly<br>
>>>> <a href="http://bit.ly/1hkC82e" target="_blank">http://bit.ly/1hkC82e</a><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Cheers<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> [b]<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>>> AusNOG mailing list<br>
>>>> <a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>
>>>> <a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" target="_blank">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><br>
>>><br>
>>> _______________________________________________<br>
>>> AusNOG mailing list<br>
>>> <a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>
>>> <a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" target="_blank">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> AusNOG mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" target="_blank">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
AusNOG mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" target="_blank">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></blockquote></body></html>